White House Staff brought three prostitutes back to their rooms at the Hilton in Columbia earlier this year, according to multiple "law-enforcement and congressional sources." Perhaps the Secret Service are finally sick of being scapegoats for the Obama camp.
The story broke last night on Fox News, and not surprisingly, has not received much attention from the mainstream media.
In April, Senator Charles Grassley requested details from the White House about an "internal administration investigation" into the possibility that the Advance Staff from the White House were involved. CNN reported at the time that the request was dismissed by Democrats as "politically motivated."
Apparently, an overdue Inspector General's report may reveal the involvement of two White House advance team members and is being awaited by Federal law enforcement personnel and a Congressional Committee.
"Obviously we're worried the draft version of the report -- what the DHS IG investigators found on the ground in Cartagena -- is going to get changed and edited before the final version gets out," said a Secret Service source with knowledge of the IG's initial findings.
According to a high-ranking Secret Service Official, "We knew very early that White House staffers were involved." If true, it means that throughout the time the mainstream media was gleefully reporting this story, they only got the half of it. At the time, despite the claim from the Secret Service Official, Jay Carney denied involvement by anyone in the White House and pointed fingers solely at the Secret Service.
Of course, it is all speculation at this point, as there are unnamed sources and the final report has not yet been released. One cannot help to speculate, if the story turns out to be true - how the night unfolded. Were Secret Service staff assigned to the advance White House personnel? Did they just go along for protection and then become scapegoats? More likely, bad behavior was shared by all. Either way, the fiasco does not inspire confidence in the White House, or the Secret Service.
Photo Source: TheSunDaily
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 160 ( 4 removed by Renee Nal )
Lies like that?
"Obama’s Muslim Apology Tour Heads to Pakistan"
"The video makes it look like Obama and Clinton are broadcasting an apology to Pakistan. Such a show of weakness will only lead to more terrorist attacks as the protesters, rather than being pacified, will go on demanding the death penalty for everyone involved with, “The Innocence of Muslims.â€"
"Sure looks like an apology to me."
Considering your avatar, is that suppose to be a surprise?
What? I think we've just had a break through. Pardon me while I try to recover.
"Obama and Hillary thinks that it will somehow calm things to "denounce the video" which has nothing to do with their rage."
Nope, nothing at all.
Just because it doesn't include the words doesn't mean it isn't an apology.
Administration and Carney Barker perform complete turnaround, and finally admit Embassy attack was pre-planned Terror, and Al-Qaida-Orchestrated...
It took only one week of lies, cover-ups and obfuscation before finally admitting what we've known all along...shocker...
"TRANSPARENCY," indeed...
Not semantics. It's like saying, well, that black guy is going to beat me up anyway, so it doesn't matter if I call him the 'N' word. Completely ridiculous thought process.
"Or, shall we say, denouncing free speech while the protesters burn American flags."
Sorry, as much as you'd like to, you can't turn this into a free speech issue. The White House is denouncing the subject matter of the video, not the right to post it. No one is taking away free speech.
"Administration and Carney Barker perform complete turnaround, and finally admit Embassy attack was pre-planned Terror, and Al-Qaida-Orchestrated..."
Aliens land on moon, point giant ray gun at Earth....
Quick! Into the escape-pods!
And yes, I noticed that you have yet again ignored the points I made. You're not real good at this debate thing.
"You really didn't make any points. You just gave your opinion which is pretty worthless." - Mama
You've got the lightweight pegged. Well done.
I'll consider the source, since that's coming from the most worthless person I've seen here so far.
"When I say "mess in the middle east", I am referring to the protests at the US Embassies."
Then the answer is yes.
"I cannot possibly debate with your opinion. Facts, I can work with. Got any?"
I've already listed them. Since you're having a hard time reading, I'll post it again...
"Not semantics. It's like saying, well, that black guy is going to beat me up anyway, so it doesn't matter if I call him the 'N' word. Completely ridiculous thought process."
And...
"Sorry, as much as you'd like to, you can't turn this into a free speech issue. The White House is denouncing the subject matter of the video, not the right to post it. No one is taking away free speech."
Maybe you have some information that I don't. If that's just my opinion, then go ahead and show me where the White House said the makers of that video shouldn't have the right to make it.
"You've got the lightweight pegged. Well done."
Another quality comment from the peanut gallery.
As my favorite all time quote indicates:
What you are speaks so loudly that I can't hear what you are saying.
Old Timey Roman Orator.
Words are not the most important.
Knowing's half the battle. Now try to do something about it.
"What you are speaks so loudly that I can't hear what you are saying."
It's hard for you to hear anything when your fingers are in your ears.
"Words are not the most important."
No, comprehension is. Which is why I said important, and not 'most' important.
source? and secondly, if he is a democrat or a republican, who gives a sh*t?
Included in that list are republican pervs (redundant) that worked in the white house.
Duh. Bill Clinton.
Wrong. I'm neither a Republicon nor Democrap.
Maybe next time...
"Of course, it is all speculation at this point..."
Nuff said.
By the bye..."there" is spelled t-h-e-i-r.
Genius.
Genius.
"they were just displaying there ignorance..."
Think again, genius.
What you meant to say is that she used the wrong form of the word, not that "there" is spelled t-h-e-i-r, because obviously, it's not.
Right, genius?
But then, we've already established that you're incapable of grasping even the simplest of concepts.
Really? Care to explain how, or am I just suppose to take your word for it? I think I explained pretty clearly why you're wrong.
"Funny, he seems right as rain to me. . ."
Well then, unlike MJK, you must have been paying attention in English class. ;)
Hey, dog boy is here. Woof woof. Now go be an good doggie and try to hump your mistress's leg. That's a good little perverted Republican woofer. LOL
akin to Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger screwing his maid ... Patricia Baena, fathered a son about 14 years ago, one week differenc between his son with Maria LOL . . . everyone knew but Maria, Hello!
Hello comments & graphics
Hyper, what do you mean?
...could you be more specific?
Please point out where on Gather you have unequivocally stated you are for same-sex civil unions that have the same rights and benefits as heterosexual marriage.
ALL.
There is nothing that you can do that I cannot under the Law. There is nothing you cannot do that I can do, under the Law.
Simple...except for those with a "hyper intellect".....
That is the compromise I would hope for.
"I would be careful to say that it is about gay people in general, I think there are some that are just trying to hijack the conversation by claiming that by denying the WORD marriage to what I believe many support, the idea of "civil union" (with all of the same benefits as marriage) is somehow tramping on civil rights. Of course it does not. I believe it is a manufactured outrage to distract from failed policies and our economic situation."
"In America, we have a culture as well, and I respect those who believe that marriage is a sacred covenant between a man and a woman, conversely, I respect homosexual couples who want to share in that sacred covenant."
and
(regarding the death threats Brad Pitt's mom got)
"Stand for traditional marriage is not standing against anything, it is standing "for" something. Just as homosexuals may stand "for" their desire to be married. And I am not against either of those positions, what I AM against, is the mainstream media "vilifying" a woman's opinion that marriage is a sacred covenant between a man and a woman as being homophobic. Did she say she hates gay people? Did she say that she supports Iran's condemning of sodomy? Did she say that gay people should not exist or should be murdered, or silenced? THAT WOULD be homophobic. Nobody took the time to have a conversation with her, instead, they jumped on her, calling her homophobic and now some freaks are making death threats against her, just as I could have predicted. It is NOT okay to make these knee-jerk judgments."
I'm happy to inform you that just because you find homosexuality to be abnormal, doesn't mean it is. And homosexuality is only unacceptable to close-minded people that stick their nose where it doesn't belong. Who are you to decide what's normal? You don't speak for me, or anyone else for that matter, besides other close-minded people such as yourself.
With Renee on this one...Being homophobic is not against the law, acting on it, yeah. It goes beyond normality~to some, to many, it's morality, and who are you/we/any f'n body to decide/judge someone else's moral beliefs?!!?
Homosexuality is a Sociopathy. regardless of what you think, say or do.
And, I speak for The Children.
Would you use the same argument that the slavery this nation had is A O.K.? Simply because that was the chosen biblical morality of the majority?
And acting on one's homophobia, August Lady, is very frequently not against the law in The U.S.A. Just one of many examples being the nearing votes on our rights in four states.
And in how many states is it still legal to fire someone because the employer feels gays are immoral?
So?
"Homosexuality is a Sociopathy. regardless of what you think, say or do."
To you. Like I said, you don't speak for me as to what is considered normal. Being an American that's able to speak doesn't grant you that right either. I'm also part of this society and I reject your notion of what you consider to be "normal".
"And, I speak for The Children."
lol, not for mine you don't.
Biblical, my a**, & do not, DO NOT, equate one's ethnicity to one's sexual proclivity! OK, if you wanna say "acting" is not illegal, go for it, but as far as I'm aware, you guys have rights upheld by law. Plus, you asked me too many questions for this time of nite...I stated an opinion & really wasn't looking for an argument!
Gays
African slaves
Herding godless redskin savages onto reservations
Discrimination against a-religious heathens
Widespread discrimination against the Jesus-killing Jews pre-WWII
Anti-Catholic riots in several cities
Women denied many different rights
Running "the heathen Chinee" out of a number of U.S.A. cities
Anti-mixed race marriage laws in ~20 U.S.A. states
Japanese-American internment camps
Anti-Sikh race riot in nearby Bellingham, WA
Crushing witches to death.
That dog only hunts with bigots now - he won't go with us lefties no more.
I speak for ALL Children.
Words have definitions. The word 'Marriage' has been assigned it's definition...that which is between a Man and a Woman.
Sir/Ma'am/whatever;
if Freedom still confuses you, we can discuss it.
I speak for ALL Children."
Delusional. Like I said, you don't speak for mine... and there's nothing you can do about it.
"Words have definitions. The word 'Marriage' has been assigned it's definition...that which is between a Man and a Woman."
Oops, sorry to have to burst your bubble, but apparently, it's not defined as just between a man and a woman....
mar·riage
noun
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law
(2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage SAME-SEX MARRIAGE