Jimmy Carter's Grandson Leaked Romney 'Freeloaders' Video

The dynamic duo of Romney and Ryan would drive the entire economy into a nose dive as long as it benefits the richest Americans. Income inequality is endangering the Middle Class and making paupers of us all who don’t have those millions upon millions of dollars. Read more about the role of Romney’s riches in this election and the power of his sacred undergarments at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/05/mitt-romneys-magic-mormon-underwear.html The working class of our country can’t AFFORD to allow this election to be bought and sold!

Fourmore years of what? It would be interesting to see now would it not, what would mother jones think is not needed? because mother joes is such a reputable news organization. Brandt, Romney and Ryan want to do what Obama has failed to do. Give all who want to work, the opportunity by getting big government out of the way of the job providers. As for your link, the subject matter is distasteful and not very tolerant.

This is just a distraction from the Middle East.

If Carter is a loser because he doesn't have a job, then so is Romney, who's been unemployed since 2007, right?

You are only a looser if we the tax payers are paying for you to do nothing and you think that it is your right. If you don’t want to work and you can feed yourself, then that is your right.

How is it that we have to learn who Mitt Romney really is through James Carter? Good for you James. Keep up the good work.

Hmmm,
Even though we don't yet know who Obama really is.
Millions of dollars spent to shield his past from prying eyes.

As far as economy is concerned, yesterday's data inform that real estate sales are raising sharply. If this is being confirmed it would mean that the consequence of the swindle created by the big banks is starting to be absorbed.

I am still worry about the 2003 sale of all the plant, know-how and patents related to the rare earths which are now monopolized by China.

If Romney is elected (1st enemy is Russia; bomb Iran; etc.) and disregard diplomacy with Iran, supporting an Israeli bombing -(if possible) - I am afrais that America will be involved in a war with Iran and Russia without the Nato help and in strategically a weak position:

Oil imports would shrink by 35% and China could set an embargo on rare earths and/or the related components. Without them, more than 75% of our weaponry will be outdated. With no oil and, nowadays, no rare earths, no one can achieve any war: China NEEDS Iran oil drastically sin order to keep an ability to work, China will not hesitate setting an embargo on main exports.

It remains quite dangerous to work with federal budgets as any home keeper does: the strength of America was mainly its very strong, when compared to other countries, in R&D.

Since 1997 the budgets are shrinking and, instead of saving the American industry, with the sale in 2003, with GWB agreement, of all the rare earths patents, tools, know-how and plants; America chose to attack Iraq which ended being far more expensive while paralyzing the whole American industries.

War instead of peace.

Just speculation about war. Fear mongering. Obama has increased the national debt to the point where we may never get out, but four more years, of what...

I'm afraid that you forget that the industrial capacity has been destroyed in 2003 and that the debt has increased, from less than than 0, to 11 trillions, thanks to a declared war in 2003 as well.

Do you really believe that these 6 years would be corrected in only 4, when usually it takes at the least 10 years to recover?

Micky:
a) Average job growth per month for Carter = 218,000
b) Average job growth per month for Reagan = 167,000

c) Carter did more to remove the Berlin wall than Reagan did. He had the CIA help the anti-government forces that were rebelling against the Russian backed Afghan government, with the accomplished objective of drawing the Russians into a war which drained them to the point that their empire collapsed.

Mickey: Thanks for your kindness. I really appreciate it.

I never thought you would compare the 4 years of Carter to the 8 of GWB who just helped starting and then instated the mess we are in:

2003 - Accepting the Chinese to dismantle the main rare earths industry we had. Therefore millions jobs were lost.

2003 - Waring losing thousands lives, tens of thousand injured people - trillions in debts.

2007 - Results of bank deregulation - subprime

Indeed in 4 years GWB did much better than Carter! (LOL)

Thanks again: 4 years of messy Carter compared to 8 of Bushito waring.

3 years for Reagan to recover - with interest rates exceeding 11% and less than 4 years for Obama to recover the mess of GWB within a far worse environment.

So good to apply a double standard system. Carter sold peanuts, GWB sold us wars. Maybe you can figure out the slight difference: for your education peanuts are still agriculture concerned; weapons are industrial concerns butthe needed rare earths were already supplied by China and the jobs outsourced to China.

Micky - Based on your logic, I'm going to assume that you love Clinton, who had the best job growth numbers in our history, after cleaning up from George HW Bush who had the lowest since Eisenhower's second term.

Mickey Mouse: Indeed Clinton started the mortgage system but DID NOT POPULARIZED IT. It has been popularized (ARMs) by Bush because of deflation and because trying to create domestic jobs.

The packages were not sold by the F Mae but by the BANKS, Lehmann Bros started these packages with, instead of 5% of "bad" credits were containing at the least 35% of them.

The bank transfers with its London branch of 50 millions in both ways was done under the very tiny nose of an SEC official.

You should not allow your hat to be talking about something it ignores: economy! ... and its history!

I still disagree. But why not after all? Your reality is far from mine but I have no time left for you.

Of course, none of that changes what Romney said. You can shoot the messenger all you want, the message remains the same.