During her RNC speech Ann Romney made claims that she and Mitt struggled financially early in their relationship. She claimed that they ate a lot of pasta and tuna, and that their dining table was nothing more than a folding ironing board. Even though her speech wasn't as awe inspiring as the one given by first lady Michelle Obama during the DNC, it still gripped those who are gullible enough to believe this woman and her husband. She recently changed her story about her financial past with Mittens, and it's not the pasta story like before.
On Sunday's Meet the Press interview, Ann Romney admitted that she and Mitt never struggled financially. However, she wanted people to understand that they've had other struggles; you know, like health difficulties and stuff. Nevermind the fact that their insane amounts of money treat their health difficulties without much problem.
It should also be noted that in 2004, Ann claimed that she and Mitt never needed to work because he had stock that they sold little by little. So why would Ann lie during her RNC speech? It's no secret that the Romney/Ryan ticket doesn't want to be a campaign run with fact checkers concerned. So why not appeal to the middle class sheeple who will vote for these guys if Mitt's wife tells a heart wrenching enough story. It's no surprise to see that she failed.
Crime analyst and profiler Chelsea Hoffman can be found on The Huffington Post, Chelsea Hoffman: Case to Case and many other outlets. Follow @TheRealChelseaH on Twitter or click here to contact Chelsea directly.
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 23
All the more reason to vote.
That is why, I honestly believe that any lie, misrepresentation or misleading statement that Mrs. Romney may have spoken, was not something she thought up nor broached, on her own. But something which she was instructed to say by either her husband or her husband's campaign manager. Remember it was a prepared speech which would have been written and preapproved by the RNC and the Romney campaign long before she took the podium.
It's quite sick and ethically as well as morally telling, when a husband either instructs his wife or allows someone else to instruct his wife, to knowingly lie in front of millions of people.
They must have learned it from Demorats, no doubt, and the socialist reporters like Chelsea here.
I laugh when liberal socialists try to claim the high ground on morals while denograting someone at the same time.
If you have information which can show proof that Mrs. Romney did not lie nor mislead the audience and televised viewing public in her convention speech, then by all means, post it here for all members to read. Upon doing so, I will retract my posted comment which you so rudely challenged.
If no such reply is forthcoming, (as I suspect) you will be viewed by me and I would assume, many other members, as a conservative who is now thoroughly embarrassed to learn that Mrs. Romney, like her husband, has been shown for what they are {i.e.} serial, but not gifted, liars.
Further, if you fail to present any supportive evidence to your challenge to my posted comment, I will also view you as being an asinine idiot for coming to Mrs. Romney's defense, without supportive documentation.
It's really amazing how first time Trolls jump into a debate or discussion, making unsupportable statements and believing that no one will find their comment to be ridiculous and call them on it's truth in content.
What is even more amazing, is the fact that conservatives feel compelled to support the unsupportable. But there again, they don't believe in, nor respond to, fact checking sources either. It must be some sort of mental reasoning disease (Defective Liars Syndrome or DLS) which originated from Mitt himself.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/05/Fact-Check-Michelle-Obama-s-False-Fairy-Tale-of-Struggle