The Obama Campaign's Big Kahuna, Jim Messina, has sent out a fundraising email that may raise more eyebrows than cash!
People expect the candidates to go head-to-head. As so many politicians have found out too late, if there are skeletons in their closet, they will be pulled out kicking and screaming! Sometimes the accusations are just funny, like Messina quoting The New York Times article about Ryan's 'radical' and 'extreme' budget, in the first 'gimme money' email after Romney/Ryan was announced. Looking back...oh so long ago...that was tame!
Some reports are talking about Messina's 'foul language' in the newest email, but to most people, that's a big stretch! He wrote, "You might be wondering why the hell Romney picked this guy," C'mon, that's not so bad! Good ole Jim wants to sound cool and appeal to the generation (which is all of them) that doesn't think 'hell' is a bad word.
Then, of course, there's the expected Ryan bashing. "Congressman Paul Ryan is the poster boy for the extreme Republican leadership in a Congress whose overall approval rating is 12 percent. His plan to dismantle Medicare is deeply unpopular with the general public, and especially undecided voters." Again with the 'extreme' thing? Then to suggest Ryan has anything to do with the dismal approval rating of Congress is laughable. Maybe 1/535th is his fault!
Saving the best for last was the real head-shaker. Rumor has it, Messina has a bit of a temper, maybe he didn't think this through much? He wrote, "...if current trends hold, more than 90 percent of that money (the 'tens or even hundreds of millions' the Romney camp has or will get) Romney will be spent on TV ads — lying, distorting and trashing Barack Obama. What? Huh? He didn't honestly write that so soon after the Priorities USA Action ad claiming Romney was responsible for a woman's death?
The denials were flying after the ad was proven false. "Uh, well you do know we don't have anything to do with Priorities USA," claimed Stephanie Cutter, the Deputy Manager of the Obama Campaign. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says, "We do not control third-party ads." Yet Messina himself met with Priorities USA, as did David Axelrod and David Plouffe, supposedly about 'fundraising activities'. How many young voters have any idea that the ad is bunk? Hopefully, with a new ad by Romney/Ryan, everyone will know.
The weirdest twist? Carney was asked if Obama would agree to a truce about negative campaign ads. Carney's answer? "I find it interesting that he would ask that." Another head-shaker! Here is a candidate willing to can the negative advertising, and rather than agree or even suggest they would discuss it, they try to make it sound like Romney is worried somehow. Then they add the comments in the email? At any point they could have denounced the 'death ad' but refuse to. Between that and the hypocritical email, they've shown what direction they plan to go. They had a chance to play it with class and refused, they better expect to get as good as they give.
© Margie Wilson-Mars 2012 for Gather News






Comments: 17
To many Tea Party members, and to many other Fiscal Conservatives in the House, when Ryan speaks, they listen--and they listen with sobriety.
I also find it even more laughable--regarding this `angle' of President Obama disavowing himself from political ADs that are not part of his campaign.
Tell me, Ms. Wilson Mars, JUST WHEN DID BUSH II CONDEMN THE SWIFT BOAT AD CAMPAIGN OF LIES THAT GREATLY ENCOURAGED SENATOR KERRY'S DEFEAT?
ULTIMATE HYPOCRISY.....
The "Obama removed work requirement from welfare" claim... a lie!
The "Obama stole from Medicare" claim... a lie!
The "Obama has made the conomy worse" claim... a lie!
I could go on and on but I think you get my point. Liars calling other people liars just doesn't hold much credibility.
Swift Boat.
If Romney is not worried he wouldn't have run the ad tying a third party's ad to Obama, falsely.
If Romney was not worried he would release more of his tax returns. If Romney was not worried he wouldn't have nominated a Congressman as his VP candidate, the first time since James S. ("Sunny Jim") Sherman in 1909. All VPs since then have been at least Senators, Governors or top ranking administration cabinet secretaries prior to becoming VP.
Whether you, or I, like it or not, Ryan's likely to gain more traction, in the coming weeks.
Maybe you don't, but I believe that voters sometimes--even more than sometimes--vote based on who sounds more convincing.
Not only will Ryan prevail strongly over Biden, in this regard, but I think Romney's presentation will become emboldened--even though Obama will win the debates.
Unemployment will be THE issue. And that's a serious problem, for any sitting President--regardless of who's to blame.....
I point out the Swift Boat hypocrisy, as well, in my above comment.
Ryan has enjoyed the luxury of being on the outside throwing bombs into the discussion until now, and even that has not spared him some blowback. Though he is a congressman, he has had nothing like the fishbowl scrutiny of a presidential campaign to which he has just become an ancillary player.
His smackdown from the Catholics and backpedalling on his Rand fascination happened outside the fishbowl. It will get worse now that ther is scrutiny.
While he is articulate he is also promoting a budget that does not make mathematical sense, let alone political sense. The problems with the budget proposal (the medicare gap in particular, which if he sticks with his more moderate evisceration of the program takes his 2040 deficit elimination date off the table entirely) will become more and more realized by voters, discussed by pundits and asked to his face on national television.
He has no answer to those questions because his budget makes no sense. How can a politician who may serve until 2032 (probably at the latest) make promises about what will happen in 2040? How can a campaign in 2012 be about 2040?
The tax question will also haunt him, as the windfall for the rich (Romney) is far too questionable a policy to get a free pass.
But either way, it is unlikely that Ryan's candidacy will decide the race. That is still up to Romney and Obama.
Here is just part of what Obama has paid millions to keep hidden
His kindergarten records
* His Punahou School records
* His Occidental College records
* His Columbia University records
* His Columbia thesis on Soviet nuclear disarmament
* His Harvard Law School records
* His Harvard Law Review articles
* His University of Chicago scholarly articles
* His passport records
* His medical records
* Complete files and schedules of his years as an Illinois state senator from 1997 to 2004
* Obama's client list from during his time in private practice with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill and Gallard
* Illinois State Bar Association records
* Baptism records
* Obama/Dunham marriage license
* Obama/Dunham divorce documents
* Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
* Adoption records