ATF Special Agent John Dodson, one year later, is still an outcast.
Before today's bombshell that President Barack Obama invoked executive privilege to withhold documents a House committee is seeking in regard to Operation Fast and Furious, Dodson sat with Fox news to share his perspective one year after he blew the whistle on the program.
Operation Fast and Furious: When did it begin?
Operation Fast and Furious was an "offshoot" of a broader government program, called Project Gunrunner, which started in 2005. Project Gunrunner was itself a part of an even larger government program, called the Southwest Border Initiative, which started in 1994. The government website states that this initiative is "a cooperative effort by federal law enforcement agencies to combat the substantial threat posed by Mexico-based trafficking groups operating along the Southwest Border."
Sadly, the "substantial threat" continues, and regardless of countless American Taxpayer dollars, the drug cartels in Mexico still terrorize Mexico and the US border states. Clearly, whatever this hefty government initiative has been doing may have made some arrests, but it is far from a success, as it is practically 20 years later, and the problem only seems to have gotten worse.
As reported by Forbes, "in 2009 the U.S. government began instructing gun store owners to break the law by selling firearms to suspected criminals." On page five of the heavily redacted 2010 briefing paper from the ATF Phoenix Field Division Group VII says, "This investigation has currently identified more than 20 individual connected straw purchasers... To date (September 2009-present) this group has purchased in excess of 650 firearms (mainly AK-47 variants) for which they have paid cash totalling more than $350,000."
According to the article, the timeline noted above is important, because:
"U.S. Justice Department hasn't made it clear to tell congressional investigators when the Fast and Furious operation began and who authorized it; as a result, this ATF briefing paper's mention of September 2009 is thus far the earliest we can trace the operation."
Representative Elijah E. Cummings stated, "Contrary to repeated claims by some, the committee has obtained no evidence that Operation Fast and Furious was a politically motivated operation conceived and directed by high-level Obama administration political appointees at the Department of Justice."
If this is true, there should be no reason Eric Holder and the Department of Justice cannot simply release this information to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, headed by Darrel Issa.
ATF Special Agent John Dodson
Dodson first told the American public that his own agency was helping to arm the Mexican drug cartels. Records show that the "Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives operation sent some 2,500 guns to the Sinaloa Cartel from September 2009 to January 2011." Dodson warned that the guns may be used to kill a border agent or other innocent citizen. After he blew the whistle, Dodson was ostracized and told to leave Phoenix, as reported by Fox News. The article states that "His former chain of command filed a complaint against Dodson for lying. Despite a mountain of evidence and testimony to the contrary, he remains on leave, rendered ineffective by the claims against him."
Executive Privilege
Of George Bush using "executive privilege," then-Senator Obama stated, "There's been a tendency of this administration to hide behind executive privilege anytime there is something a little shaky. The President would be best served in coming clean on this." That should go for Mr. Obama, as well, the man who once declared,
"Going forward, anytime the American people want to know something that I or a former president wants to withhold, we will have to consult with the Attorney General and the white house counsel, whose business it is to ensure compliance with the rule of law. Information will not be withheld just because I say so; it will be withheld because a separate authority believes my request is well-grounded in the Constitution. Let me say it as simply as I can: transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."
Watch President Obama discuss how George W. Bush "hides" behind Executive Privilege.








Comments: 43
Better that Congress impeach Holder, though I doubt the Democrats in the Senate would ever allow a conviction.
My bet is, you are correct.
standards that they create for Republicans, Conservatives and Christians.
As a phrase which the so called great communicator Republican President was renouned to use. " Well There You Go Again" insinuating that Christianity is some sort of third political party in the United States, when it is not and never will be as long as the U.S. Constitution is the law of America and it's people. So stop trying to force your christianity into our country's political system, it's useless, boring and ridiculous in projected thought.
I never "insinuated" that Christianity was some sort of "third party", but you and the rest of the democommiRATS always come at it as if it IS. Communists MUST remove all mention of GOD in order to promote their God-less agenda. I'm not "forcing" anything on you or anyone else, but you bristle at the mention. I think it was Satan who did that too. Hmmm.
I'll leave you with THIS oh dark shadowed one...
"America is like a healthy body and it's resistance is threefold: it's PATRIOTISM, it's MORALITY, and it's SPIRITUAL LIFE. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within." - Joseph Stalin
... is THAT what you were referring too?
...funny (not) how those three areas are the three areas that are under constant attack by the democommiRATS.
Thanks for the set-up.
As for "The Atheists," why are you worried about that? Atheists only account for a tiny fraction of our overall population.
And the line: "The democrats seem to be pushing for the downfall of America. Their support for this administration's agendas prove this. " The very same thing can be said of the Republicans and the last administration.
" It used to be that Republican politicians were Christians (not saying that's good or bad) as a faith rather than something they use to pump up campaigns with support from the Christian conservative base." And what do you expect when Christianity is under constant attack. It's survival.
"As for "The Atheists," why are you worried about that? Atheists only account for a tiny fraction of our overall population." It's the "squeaky wheel" theory. They seem to get heard while Christian voices are silenced. Why are atheists listened to while Christians must remain silent?
"America is like a healthy body and it's resistance is threefold: it's Patriotism, it's MORALITY, and it's SPIRITUAL LIFE. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within." - Joseph Stalin
Those three areas are under constant attack from the democrats...
THAT is why we fight!!
"...why are you worried about that?"
These people who are taken in by the libby/Dems/Progressives propaganda must of been listening to Tokyo Rose..lol
They need to look up Clintons mentor and see how racist this man was... They need to look at Al Gores fathers voting record... he didnt even want the law passed to grant civil rights and most DEMS DIDNT EITHER...
Most of the time Renee, I dont even give them an answer for one thing, I think its Wyoming .
Some just come on here looking to insult, you can tell by their attack attitude... then when you see who most of them are hooked up with, it makes you wonder if they arent all of one person...lol trying to convince everyone that they have alot of clout and friends on here.. Typical liberal scheme... So I wonder who they will become next week.... I guess its whoever their imaginary friend wants to be...
People who yell racism usually mean racialism, to prefer people of one's own race, religion and social background.
We now have a situation in Britain, since the Equalities Bill was passed in which if somebody is accused of racism, sexism or homophobia there is no legal defence. If the accuser feels they have been insulted because of race, gender or sexuality thie accused is guilty. How many traditional civil rights does that violate? (Right to a fair trial for a start.)
Obviously laws like this fuel a compensation culture becase once the accused is found guilty the accuser launches a claim for compensation.
Fortunately the law was passed under the last government and so far, due to legal obstructions, no cases have yet been prosecuted. The current government know what a can of worms it would open.
Prejudice may indicate moral deficiency in a person but when the state starts to legislate to dictate our private moral values we have lost all our democratic rights.
As you say however, unfounded charges of racism are a handy tool to shut down discussion.
unfounded charges of racism are a handy tool to shut down discussion. Yes, they are thrown around to easily, and it is a defense of someone who has no defense.
How about treason for supplying arms to those that want to kill us
Is the Executive privalage for the President and his advisors or does it extend to everyone working in the Executive branch? Can a janitor who works in a government building in Kansas City be covered by it or is jsut for that information that is use by the President directly or indirectly (such as used by a person advising the President)?
For if it is to cover every governemtn employee then it would seem that the Congress shold never have acccess to any Executive branch papers or information. If it is only to cover the President and his advisors then by invoking Executive Privalage it would seem that the President or his adviors we directly involved in the decision related to the Fast and Furious.