"Obama Girl," otherwise known as Amber Lee Ettinger, has lost her crush on the president and is refusing to pick sides in the 2012 election.
Who cares what this bimbo thinks, you say? Well, sadly, there were actually Americans who voted for Obama in 2008 because this dingbat told them to. It's frightening, but true.
During the last election cycle, the 29-year-old model appeared in a steamy video, in which she jiggled in a bikini next to a photo of a shirtless Obama.
However, the country has changed since the exhilarating days of 2008, when the then-senator was promising to lower the oceans and end all war. It turns out, Obama is actually a pretty awful president. Who knew that installing a community organizer in the most powerful job on the planet would be ill-advised?
It now sounds like Obama Girl is now suffering right along with other Americans. She's apparently unemployed and plans on returning to school full-time.
And, while there won't be an "I Got a Crush on Obama" video this year, Ettinger hasn't endorsed Mitt Romney, either. Obama girl's being coy about who her man is for 2012 and, thankfully, is keeping her opinions to herself.
Hopefully, she and other Americans will focus on competence and experience when they go to the polls in November, rather than who looks better in board shorts.
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 105
However, given the clownish nature of the Republican freak show, Obama stands as the only choice for rational voters.
Would you like to list all those disasters that our President has brought upon America ?
Ha!! Accusations coming from the PAID Obama lying "truth squad". How funny is THAT?!!"
Given that Republicans and their Supre PACs have far, far, far more money than the Democrats (outspent them 33 to 1 in the recent Wisconsin debacle), allegations that Obama has shills working on his behalf here on Gather sound pretty hollow and ridiculous. However, people often do accuse others of the things they themselves are guilty of. So, Nate, how much does Romney pay you for your blinding insight?
I wonder if he feels it is worth the money. Of course, when you represent the interests of the rich, having money to spend is rarely a problem.
HERE is an example of Obama's lying "TRUTH TEAM"
Yes, I did overstate the case a little, though not deliberately. I had heard the figure of 33 to 1 at the time of the vote. In fact it was 7 to 1. Not so extreme but still outrageously one sided. This is called buying the election.
Since you guys are always claiming that Republicans are better money managers, keep in mind that the Republicans picked up 53% of the approx. 2.5 million votes cast in Wisconsin at a price tag of $31 million in campaign expense, versus the Democrats 46% of those votes at a cost of $4,000,000. That means the Republicans spent an average of $23.40 per vote to the Democrats $3.48 per vote.
If you want sound money management the election alone shows that you should vote Democrat.
They've lost that loving feeling....
When you all can produce the voting records that show that the Dems didn't vote for ALL of those things too....Then your blame it all on Bush will be valid.
Until then it's all in your progressive we hate Bush imaginations.
Another crap choice.