Nicolas Sarkozy--famous for being extravagant, charismatic, and husband to Carla Bruni--is the first French president to lose the re-election bid in over 30 years. His presidency came to an abrupt end yesterday after he was beaten in the polls by "an unassuming and bespectacled Socialist" named Francois Hollande. Could his flashy lifestyle, including his famous marriage to the beautiful Italian supermodel-singer-actress, be to blame?
Critics say 'yes'--that his superficial 'self-centered antics' are ultimately what led to his downfall. When he was elected five years ago, he promised 'youthful,' refreshing change to traditional France (not unlike Obama's campaign for change in the U.S.). But it seems he did too much for himself and not enough for his country and its economic problems. After his victory speech in 2007, Sarkozy celebrated that same night at one of the most expensive and ritzy restaurants on the Champs-Elysees, and then "jetted off to the yacht of a tycoon friend in the Mediterranean." Critics thought this was showy and superficial to say the least.
Another thing the ex-president did that captured the media's attention was marrying Italian-born former supermodel Carla Bruni, not long after his divorce to his first wife, and only nine weeks after meeting Bruni. Something so outwardly scandalous would never fly in America (where politicians prefer to keep their sketchy sexual escapades hidden), and at first raised eyebrows among the French, but Mrs. Bruni-Sarkozy quickly charmed everyone as France's new First Lady. Now, sources say she is a bit of a mess after her husband's defeat.
'Sarko' threw the blame for his presidential failures on Europe's financial crisis on the 2012 campaign trail, saying he was more or less powerless, but changed his tune yesterday, saying: "I take full responsibility for this defeat....I am [now] preparing to become just one French citizen amongst many." One has to wonder if he is sadder to fail at the presidency or the prospect of losing some of the perks of his extravagant lifestyle.
Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.




Comments: 14
They have just voted to throw themselves over the cliff.
Since now more than a full year, people in Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, Belgium and more recently Netherlands have been trying to apply a similar to the Tea Party system in order to fight the debts.
France was among them with some special French property due to a Constitution which set the President somehow like a king: he concentrates all the powers and many clashes took place during the last 5 years, and mainly lately, with the PM (Fillon) because of te character of Sarkozy.
Even, during his last campaign for President it happened that Sarkozy and the PM, campaigning separately, issue contradictory statements because at the last instant there were changes the PM was not aware!
Power concentration into one hand, the appearance to "depend" from Germany, the appeal of Merkel for a support to Sarkozy (as if Cameron would call for support to Romney), too many positions given to friends, a mess with Bettencourt (l;Oreal) who may have provided funds for the 2007 campaign to Sarkozy, the production of the agreement with Ghadaffi who grated - it seems - 50 million Euros to the 2007 campaign, and top of top, the recent decision of the European bank to low down the austerity to cope with the debts were the real reasons.
Sarkozy is a lawyer, not an economist and all these scandals issued a loss of confidence.
The used words after the disappointment: war, enemy, fight, etc. will no doubt have an influence on the coming Congress election to take place within the next 5 weeks.
Hollande, the new president, to the contrary to Sarkozy, is a very simple and communicative man who listen to each party before making any decision. He's a BRILLIANT economist who wants to ease a bit the austerity and create some demand for sparkling the recovery.
He intends to raise the taxes of the most wealthy who make more than the eq. of $1.3 million per month. He will as well raise the property taxes from 0.3% to 1.8%, momentarily, while the recovery is not starting. But this needs the Congress agreement.
But more than anything, Hollande is used to cooperation and despite his proverbial calm and somehow kind appearance, is a very strong man no corporation has ever been able to corrupt.
His department (State for US equivalent), the State Chirac was also heading many years ago, is mainly a farmer one and, despite of the actual economic mess, is one of the best managed one with good economic results in comparison to many others.
When he became aware of his victory he just said "C'est bien" (Good).
His PM will be nominated on May 15 or 16.
What do you mean? It looks to me that you intend to say that Hollande will get into it!
I say let’s do an experiment. Let us stand back and watch and see what happens. The world should let them go and sort this out as they think they have the answer. The people have spoken and the direction is clear. We should not disenfranchise the people of these countries by giving them bail out money when they are choosing to not spend wisely.
The fact is that this is a plan for disaster and will fail. You can’t spend your way out of debt as a family, a country or a planet. That is the real reason we can’t interfere. We have no money and printing more only causes inflation (it’s a hidden tax on the poor).
Paying down debt and Spending only what the taxes will provide is the solution.
4 years too late. We need a guy who agrees with your last sentence exactly NOW.