Birther sheriff of Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio, believes that President Barack Obama was either born in Kenya or brought to the States as a young child. However, it appears that the moron's reasoning behind this belief stem from not being able to prove otherwise—although the proof is in fact present. Good grief!
"The posse cannot confirm yet that Obama was not born in Kenya and brought to the United States as a days-old infant for his birth to be registered in Hawaii," said the World Net Daily—(insert bouts of laughter here). It seems that logic escapes the birther mentality, but at the least these people are serving as some hilarious entertainment.
For the rest of the sane America, it's already well known and accepted that the POTUS was born in Hawaii, and most of the country has seen the man's long and short form birth certificates. So this is really just a prime example of beating a dead horse. Of course, sheriff Joe Arpaio is grasping as desperately as he can to this becaue the ultra conservatives and Orly Taitz followers are dreading the upcoming elections. The outlook for the next four years looks great for Obama, with the most viable GOP candidate being Mitt Romney, who is laughable on his best day.
So, sit back and relax as birthers like Joe Arpaio, Orly Taitz, and the rest of their sheeple scramble about looking for anything they can to prove something that isn't real. The rest of the country will simply laugh at the little racists and their sad attempts.
Crime analyst and profiler Chelsea Hoffman can be found on The Huffington Post, Chelsea Hoffman: Case to Case and many other outlets. Follow @TheRealChelseaH on Twitter or click here to contact Chelsea directly.
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 244
That's the problem with trying to prove yourself right... you almost always do. It's why we execute innocent people for murders they had nothing to do with (and vice versa), and it's why birthers always have a ready arsenal of "proof." All the things that would make them wrong are ignored, or circuitously explained away.
But Chuck..., "(t)his dimwit, and every other dimwit who believes in the 'birther' worldview," doesn't have much use for science, anyway. The basic "hypothesis" they believe in certainly ain't "null" - it's the "right hypothesis". In other words, they are "right".
No point in engaging CVhgucky Bum and Stevie Babe, for them a thing is only scientific if it confirms their prejudices. Subjected to digital analysis the alleged Kenyan birth certificate looks more genuine that either of the alleged Hawaiian birth certificates.
That is not to say either IS genuine. I have evidence Obama is not even human but I'm saving that until the campaign proper gets underway. (that's a cue for all the Bammy worshippers who've had a quadruple sense of humour bypass to challenge me to produce it)
Jo Jo. Thanks for keeping this nonsense alive. Btw, I'm wondering what jurisdiction an AZ sheriff has in the State of Hawaii. Oh, I get it. The "suspicious document" is kind of like those "suspicious" folks, who have to "show papers" in AZ - right? Right....
I think Obama should be impeached just for that...
I think you have the usual "liberal" problem of total lack of ability to employ nuance, make fine distinctions and think critically...It comes from having your entire belief structure based upon a false premise...
With a REAL American Black father and a ghetto upbringing??? Hell, I'm just as "Black" as Obama...
Why don't you roll over and play breitbart?
Actually, what suttles said is racist...
"With a REAL American Black father and a ghetto upbringing??? "
With the insinuation that the only genuine black American experience is ghetto upbringing.
As for jerk, I'm sure you do a lot of it.
Racism is the belief that inherent different traits in human racial groups justify discrimination. In the modern English language, the term "racism" is used predominantly as a pejorative epithet. It is applied especially to the practice or advocacy of racial discrimination of a pernicious nature (i.e., which harms particular groups of people), and which is often justified by recourse to racial stereotyping or pseudo-science. Racism is popularly associated with various activities that are illegal or commonly considered harmful, such as extremism, hatred, xenophobia, (malignant or forced) exploitation, separatism, racial supremacy, mass murder (for the purpose of genocide), genocide denial, vigilantism (hate crimes, terrorism), etc.
Apparently, Suttles believes that the "race" of the president has some importance which is, in modern day America, racist...If you can't keep up with the rules of PC, you probably should just keep it to your self and avoid embarrasment...
As for "Ghetto" upbringing, I am just attempting to plug into the modern stereotype that many Black Americans believe...pardon me for EMPATHY!!!
Substitute " Arch-typical Modern American Black" up bringing...
"When I was young and in my prime-
I usta jerk off all the time-
Now I'm old and getting gray-
I only jerk off twice a day."
http://www.moccany.org/
im lizzing...
"The Huffington Post"
Nice addition to the outlets that carry your work...Kudos! I personally don't like your positions or content much but that is a great achievement.
Now back to the subject of your post;
The President's staff posted a fraudulent document on the white house website claiming that it was the long form birth certificate reflecting President Obama's birth in Hawaii, which was analyzed by a group commissioned by "Sheriff Joe", they found the "birth certificate" posted on the white house web site was a manufactured document as others before them who analyzed the document also found.
It doesn't prove that the President wasn't born here but it certainly proves that a fraudulent document was posted on the white house web site, and "Sheriff Joe" is correct in saying that we as of now we can't be sure of the birth place of President Obama.
Chuck...I thought you were above this topic...
OK mebbe that's not really a good excuse, but it IS Sheriff Joe.
How many aliases has Barry had??? Where are his college and law school records??? Why doesn't he have a law license??? Why doesn't Mishy have a law license?? Explain his support by George Soros??? Need I go on???
You have demonstrated the ability to parrot frightwing twaddle as if anyone with more than a room temperature IQ would not see through it.
And, as for parroting...well, I have never seen an original thought from you...straight from "liberal" 101...and, not very well parroted at that...
The analysis of the document posted on the White house web site showed that it was a manufactured document.
Your denial dosen't change anything.
Yes...David...Let's all just fall into lock step behind you. apparently, the word "bigot", to you, means "disagrees with "liberals"...It would be so much easier if the Prez and his "progressive agenda" had no opposition at all...Then it wouldn't even be necessary for him to lie to us... I think you are a Liberal Bigot...
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs. The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religious belief or spirituality, political alignment, nationality, language, sexual orientation, and age; and to those from a different region, with non-normative gender identity, those who are homeless, and those with various medical disorders, particularly behavioural and addictive disorders. Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views.
I don't think I have ever considered actually categorizing the rabid disdain liberal/progressives display for Conservatives in just that way before...
Actually, "Tea Partiers" and, even, conservatives comprise a very disparate group that people like David seem to lump into one "inferior" group ...sounds like bigotry to me...classic definition
And what happens?
A commenter with a history of obnoxiousness arrives to do exactly what I had said was happening - creates their own "reality" to cover for their own lack of veracity.
When asked not to address me further (since he has a long history of this sort of behavior on this venue) he immediately goes into his attack mode - multiple comments and more surreality in order to protect his ego and defend his ideologically staked out position.
It's unfortunate, but this sort of harassment and attempt to intimidate tends to reflect poorly on the level of maturity and ethics of the commenter, and is largely the reason for his past removals from Gather. He seems not to have learned how to behave like an adult, as his harassing comments to others on this very post clearly demonstrate.
Perhaps SkyWriters such as Chelsea and others could moderate their comments so as not to reduce Gather's SEO due to obnoxious commenting. That certainly would benefit them and Gather and SkyWords.
I'll leave it up to Gather to count the obnoxious attacks on others by one commenter on one SkyWords post.
And frankly, it is exactly this kind of behavior that epitomizes the tea party extremists. And in doing so they have intentionally tried to thwart the ongoing recovery and given China a big boost ahead in the race for modernity and strategic innovation. It's too bad that the tea party and its immature followers are more interested in protecting their egos than furthering America's interests.
Goodbye.
Oh, and complete irrelevence...
The only obnoxious comments here are David's. the rest merely disagree with him...He perfectly demonstrates the "liberal" bigot's idea of free speech...
Birther sheriff of Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio, believes that President Barack Obama was either born in Kenya or brought to the States as a young child. However, it appears that the moron's reasoning behind this belief stem from not being able to prove otherwise—although the proof is in fact present. Good grief!
How could one not find reason to challenge such obvious bias???
Since I've never claimed to *not* be biased, for one thing ;) I'm fine with my bias and my target audience is as well. I couldn't really give a care less about the rest ;)
How long did the democrats cover up the fact that Kennedy was banging a mobster's GF while in the White house??? Or... FDR's affair with one of his aides?
And..."I didn'y have sex with that woman..."
Taking a politician's word for anything is only for apologists...like Chelsea...
But...you're both young...you'll probably learn...
at least the examples you provided included women who were willing participants.... just sayin' ;)
And, not Clinton...he used his influence to seduce a subordinate...classic example of constructive rape...she might as well have been drunk...if a private sector CEO did that, he would have gone to jail...And you would be all over it with your self righteous indignation...That is why I think you are intellectually dishonest...just sayin'...
I don't really care about the sex lives of politicians unless it reveals a lack of character...like Clinton lying to me on prime time...and quibbling about what the meaning of "is" is...and lying under oath...et al...
and I've never heard of a CEO in the private sector going to jail for banging an assistant.... but I've heard of many losing their wives because of it.. funny.. care to share source of this claim? I'm a "learner" so it would be enlightening ;)
"it's not about the *crime* it's about the coverup" because inquiring minds want to know who the presidents are porking consensualy right?
of course I guess it's better to rabble rouse about that than all the republicans that have been busted for sex with children and animals, which are actually crimes....
you just made me so proud! hahahaha!
hey .. that's the definition of atheist...
Get over yourself...
My original comment.
The tea party bigots continue to create their own reality (in contrast with actual reality). They do so to give cover for their abject bigotry. And dishonesty.
Bigotry has no place in America.
Goodbye JJtDFB/JR
Sorry Chelsea. Harassment is not acceptable.
Get your facts straight...Arpiao is investigating the validity of the long form birth certificate...I see no comments from him about where Obama was born...As usual, you are a sensationalist, a shoddy journalist with a pre-conceived agenda and a bigot...Obviously, you hate Arpiao because he is of Hispanic immigrant descent...
just an option
The real romance in the Obama "debate" is the lengths he went to to dodge the question...Why didn't he publish his long form on Day One???
And, as I inquired above:
How many aliases has Barry had??? Where are his college and law school records??? Why doesn't he have a law license??? Why doesn't Mishy have a law license?? Explain his support by George Soros??? Need I go on???
He brought this suspicion upon himself...
Fine distinctions, ladies...fine distinctions...nuance...
Seriff Joe never once mentioned Obamas birth place or where he was raised. The report only covered the "birth certificate" and presented good evidence it is a forgery. That is all.
World Net Daily. He said he said - They call that hearsay.
I'm sorry - that's just too stupid.
To tell the truth, I wouldn't have released ANYTHING once these stupid birthers started in. I would've enjoyed every minute of their frustrated anger and foot-stomping childishness.
Truth is, it all breaks down anywhere you start. There was no conspiracy at his birth to make him president and to create false documents to do so. Until this came up, most people didn't even know there WAS a long form. And as I said earlier, NOBODY has even VAGUELY approached this with the true scientific method of investigation.
This is stupid, but let 'em run with it. It'll detract from reality when reality truly matters.
Yeah, right! You lost me right there. I know good and well that you know better than that.
Chuck, there was no attempt by the Sheriff to determine where BO was born. The only thing he looked into was that phony birth certificate. They proved it was very likely a phoney and that is all.
Considering she was a very pretty young woman in her day -- I'll take that as a compliment.
Id bang her! She'd have to be shorter than me though..
but im only 5'2
that was funny
so funny :)
Yes, who did?
And, Joe is just investigating the authenticity of a document that came to light under suspicious circumstances...
Time will tell...no use to argue about it...
Bush won Florida...trust me, I know, I took two months off to watch it on the Tee Vee...
You can say "selected" all day long it doesn't change the facts.
Al Gore and his cronies including the local election boards tried to count the ballots in every way possible to get him the election, when their efforts drove them past the state posted time limit they sued and the liberal courts forced the state to accept the delinquent ballot count.
Then when they still didn't win the ballot count they sued for a re-count of specific counties where they thought they could win (influence) the count.
That's when Bush and Co. went to the supreme court to challenge the partial count as being unconstitutional...to which the SCOTUS said, you've had enough time the ballot count stands.
Like Jo Jo posted ELECTED!
There was no excuse for us to give the fool and the horror show a shot at running the country, but we did, we Democrats, liberals, Progressives, et al. We let the real base down, ignored it, counted on it to be there without our asking for its help, and we gave away the election by our own arrogance. We were so confident Bush's agenda was obvious, we let him win.
Here's a question for you... when did YOU know it was Dubya's intention to go to war in Iraq? My fellow liberal friends' answer would be wrong.
Laura and I had ranted to our friends so much before the election that she turned to me and said, "Now we really ARE going to war in Iraq aren't we?" And we did.
Oh, and 1/12/2001 was like LBJ and the Gulf of Tonkin incident that wasn't.
The irony is that Dub or one of his more articulate henchmen might have made a good case for invading Iraq but the "WMD/get the terrorists" excuse was so lame that insulted my intelligence...too bad the Great Unwashed need "revenge" or some other stupid excuse for war...Or...Is it???
If Dub had just told the truth..."we need to protect the Saudis because they control our oil supply, have gotten obscenely rich off of us, but still need our army to protect them, but, don't worry, it will all be catered by Haliburton which will save the VP's company's ass (and they have me, personally, by the balls...), I would have understood that...
As to the birther nonsense, if one is a Republican, one perhaps notices that the primary season so far has left their 2012 presidential hopes in disarray, with Romney seen as just not crazy enough by the Tea Party contingent. If you can't beat the guy in the voting booth, perhaps just try to argue that he is not eligible?
:)
Only morons believe in Keynes...Even Keynes didn't believe in Keynes...
That said, dont you think that Mr Arpaio should perhaps be playing with his grandchildren (if he has any) rather than wasting his time on issues which offer precious little benefit to the world at large? Seeing as the old toad seems hell bent on staying on in office like some tin pot dictator perhaps he should focus on law and order?
How hard would it be to delete all of that...
You are begging the question...IT DOESN'T MATTER WHERE HE WAS BORN...having one parent as a US Citizen makes you natural born...
Saw a movie with graphic un-natural born. It was not pretty.
Looked like a dog faced boy.
However, the entire issue of Barack Obama's eligibility was brought to the forefront by lawyers acting on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2008.
Specifically, Phil J. Berg, hardly a member of any vast right wing conspiracy, was an ardent supporter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, and her candidacy for the presidency.
Notwithstanding his liberal pedigree, Phil J. Berg was hot on the trail of one Barack Obama, because Berg wished to protect the American people from electing a non-citizen to the most powerful office in the world.
In August 2008, before Obama was officially nominated by the Democrat party, Mr. Berg filed a legal challenge to Obama's constitutional eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
On October 23, Mr. Berg filed a Motion to Expedite Resolution of Berg V. Obama, summarized directly below:
"This motion argues that the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United States, and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:
• That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a natural born or naturalized United States citizen.
• That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
• That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.
• That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.
• That Barack Hussein Obama's, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States."
There you go! The inconvenient truth is as follows:
HILLARY CLINTON IS THE MOTHER OF ALL BIRTHERS!!!!
This post doesn’t prove where Obama was or was not born. It DOES show where the “birther movement” got it’s start. If you wish to lay blame, blame the SOURCE.