"Wait til' they see what happens March 1st."
Those words were uttered by Andrew Breitbart to journalist Lawrence Sinclair three weeks ago at a political event in Washington, D.C.
Apparently, the man behind BigGovernment.com, BigJournalism.com, and BigHollywood.com was about to drop the equivalent of an atom bomb on President Barack Obama's reelection hopes. Is it purely coincidental he died just hours before the release of the bombshell?
Friends of the online entrepreneur and Tea Party leader are saying he did, in fact, have a pre-existing heart problem. Nevertheless, it's completely natural for people to wonder if foul play was involved. This was a 43-year-old man full of vitality.
If Breitbart's lieutenants don't release the video, supposedly of Obama in college, alongside domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, conspiracy theories will continue to abound. You can call Breitbart many things, but he didn't make false promises.
During a speech at the CPAC convention last month, the "Big Hollywood" chief mentioned the mystery tapes, to the delight of the crowd gathered.
"I've got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008," he said.
Where are the tapes now? When will they be disclosed to the public?





Comments: 94
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, seems highly unlikely.
Breitbart was an angry man, and anger can affect your heart. If he had an family history of health problems, and he didn't take care of himself, it could certainly lead to death. And looking at him, he looked much older than 43.
I feel bad for his wife and four kids, I know how tough that can be.
And it's not a wonder you have to pay for it, but you and your hero Rush have that in common.
You don't appear to know English very well. What planet were you born on?
Ali, I have met Andrew and he honestly wasn't an angry person at all. Everyone that knew him would agree. He was passionate in a wacky kinda way, but not at all angry. Not in the Type A-gonna have a heart attack any second, way.
I've heard that ... which is why he is sometimes referred to as 'the happy warrior"?
It is my belief as well as my continuing fervent prayer that the keywords here are, "In a stunning coincidence..."
As for the release of the tapes, I saw someone on Hannity last night .... Ahh it was a Stephen Bannon. He said the tapes would most certainly be released and probably on the Hannity show. He said 'next week' but I think it would be better to wait a while (unless there is any worry that waiting could bring about a situation in which they would never be released).
conspiracy theories are boring. I need to get some work done today. bye.
The coroner has not yet released the autopsy report, the man has yet to receive an honorable funeral much less, yet to be buried, and already his Teapublican fan club members are using his untimely death as a means by which to begin spewing conspiracy paranoia concerning his unfortuneate demise.
With friends and fans like Mr. Breitbart had among the Teapublicans, he certainly did not need any enemies. In fact his best friends may well be his Democrat political opponents who at least have had enough respect for him and his family, as to not speak ill of him in death.
Boy, am I glad that I am a Liberal Democrat, cause them Teapubs can be hell on earth, even to their own deceased.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzIw44w00ow
And this one:
http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=9
I'm going to dinner now. Then I'll come find some more. Just a little food for thought here, Obama has already ordered the assassinations of US Citizens, so saying he would never order such an act is BS.
R. F. I'm not sure where you got your timeline but the actual events (without all the extra yadda yadda added by mediamatters) went something like this.
July 22, 2010 10:50 A.M"The one big fact standing in the way of NAACP’s claim that they were snookered by both FNC and Breitbart is just the little fact tht they had the video the whole time. Yeah, the whole thing. I guess that makes them….kinda stupid, or just plain irresponsible. Ah pick one, I don’t care."
Media Matters, Huffington Post and the rest of the Progressive blogosphere and Lame Street Media are attempting to paint collusion between Breitbart, Fox News and the Conservative blogosphere on this story.
Oddly enough, this comes just as we have the Daily Caller story about how the Progressives used a web forum called Journolist to collude against Fox News, John McCain, Sarah Palin, the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh and others. Imagine that! Me thinks she, Shirley, and the LSM, doth protest too much.
As did others.
And before the full video was "found" and released by the NAACP.
Which means they (Fox) couldn't have been the impetus (or the only one) for the "snookering" of anyone. +shaking my head slowly back and forth+
R. F. you said: The subsequent uproar in 2010 prompted the Obama administration to seek her resignation.
The subsequent uproar lasted all of 2 hours before Sherrod was requested to resign. Wow. I didn't realize how fast that happened ... According to the timeline MediaMatters put out, it took only 2 hours for "the uproar" to goad the administration to goad Sherrod's immediate superiors to goad a resignation from her.
This part did happen very quickly: it took only 2 hours for "the uproar" to goad the administration to goad Sherrod's immediate superiors to goad a resignation from her.