A new PBS documentary on the life of former President Bill Clinton airs Monday and Tuesday. The documentary begins with the Rose Garden confession about the Monica Lewinsky affair. Is this really the "start" of Bill Clinton's legacy?
The film was written and produced by Barak Goodman. Goodman is the co-founder of Ark Media. His company has been nominated for an Academy Award and won many filmmaking awards including the Peabody. He decided to create the 4-hour "Clinton" film because he wanted to document the similarities (and differences) between Barack Obama and Bill Clinton.
The documentary begins with the Lewinsky story and several staff members and associates are interviewed, some speaking for the first time about the affair. Yet, Monica Lewinsky, herself, does not appear in the film. The reason—to prevent the documentary from being "sensationalized."
Lewinsky has kept a low profile over the years and moved to London in 2005 to avoid the spotlight. This film will likely throw her right back into the fray. Why is it that when someone mentions Bill Clinton's name today, his political career is not talked about, only his brief interlude with Lewinsky is mentioned?
Programs about JFK do not begin with his affairs with Marilyn Monroe, Angie Dickenson or Kim Novak. Nor do programs about Eisenhower, Johnson, Harding, Roosevelt or Jefferson begin by discussing their extra-marital activities.
Lewinsky is not involved in this documentary, she is not trying to sell anything, she gets no money from this project, and she is trying to go on with her life. It is unfair to begin a serious documentary about a great President's legacy with something so unimportant. Leave the girl alone!
And if Newt Gingrich is mentioned in the film, since he was the main pit bull in the attack on Clinton, his affair, happening at the same time, is probably not mentioned or explored in great detail. Hopefully the film explains the near impeachment as the witch-hunt that it was.








Comments: 50
Clinton WAS Impeached.
Also, the reason we hear so often of Clinton's legacy as being connected to the Lewinsky affair--instead of Triangulation, NAFTA, NATO/Bosnia, etc--is because of the very powerful Right Wing Attack Machine-Echo Chamber in this country.
Over and over again, they pounded home the scandal and nothing else--so that you forget about the Economic Prosperity, under the two term Democrat.
And, yes, it was a Witch-Hunt.
However, we can't forget that President Clinton "was nabbed" for Perjury--and this is, technically a serious crime.....even if you are lying, simply about sex.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!
Clinton was impeached. Other presidents may have had affairs but none of them were formally called on the carpet, so to speak.
Clinton lied to the nation (dare I say the world?).
Clinton was already a well-known (alleged) philanderer. I'm from Little Rock. The rumors were around when I was in grade school, when he was only governor. The only person who
got around more than Slick Willie was Sweet Sweet Connie. Google his name & Paula Jones. Deborah Matthis. Lencola Sullivan. Bobby Ann Williams. Gennifer Flowers.
He embarassed the entire country.
The whole affair was sordid and tacky and as a Southerner Clinton should know we don't do tacky.
So yes, *that* is his legacy.
It transcends party, Southerners do Tacky probably more spectacularly than anyone else.
It was not "near impeachment", Clinton was fully impeached but not convicted.
The "witch hunt" resulted in the conviction of Clinton on felony pujury and he was disbarred from legal practice.
To characterize lawful conviction and disbarment as a "witch hunt" is really lame.
THAT is a which hunt. It happens to every Democrat. Don't think for a second that the Republicans aren't doing the same thing to Obama now with all this birther BS.
This man was a predator, and many of his "advances," and his peccadillo's, weren't welcome. Not to mention much of the stalking and terrorising that was done subsequently.
Your BIAS is showing, Lora. You'd be outraged if it were any other man.
I feel he is unjustly criticized for this Lewinsky thing. Just as I feel Obama is being harassed for no good reason about his birth certificate and his religion.
On the other hand, other Presidents have committed, in my opinion, REAL crimes against society and other countries and those crimes go unpunished and seemingly unnoticed.
Unfortunately, that is how you Alinsky-worshippers Operate...
If Obama deserved any, I'd even give it to him.
Regardless, I'd definitely stand in respect were he to enter the room.
Clinton used his cabinet and administration to lie to the people and the media. That is plain and simple abuse of office.
He lied under oath concerning the assault on Paula Jones. That is felony perjury.
Why do these criminal acts not matter to you?
I don't think he did ANYTHING criminal. Other Presidents, have done criminal acts that get no attention.
Why the fascination with Bill Clinton's sex life? Could it be because the opposing politicians were jealous that they could not carry on affairs AND keep a wife too? That's nothing to brag about, but Clinton was able to do it while others failed at two or three or more marriages.
I'm sorry but I just cannot picture Bill as a sexual predator.
Oh, that's right. Lying about sex is much worse than lying about the reason we went to war.
Clinton's philandering, while not admirable, is between him and Hillary. How many thousands died because of Bush's lies?
Nearly every Country on the Security Council, and most in Congress, both Left and Repube, voted for Military action. Allies from over 30 Countries joined and fought side-by-side with us. It was the right course of action, and everybody knows it (who is capable of clear thought).
And, Clintons extracurriculars, AGAIN, weren't the grounds for his impeachment, Puddin'head.
He sent his goons to the residence of another who threatened to reveal his predatory behaviour; her tires were slashed, they killed her Chat and left it on her porch, and approached her with the favourite quote of the Gangster..."Those are some beautiful Children you have, Lady..."
Lora, nobody cares who he was banging, consensually; or which sluts were angling to spend time "before him" on their knees....however, rape, stalking, and LYING UNDER OATH are, the last time I heard, ILLEGAL...SO, stop obfuscating the real issues.
You DO take a position against RAPE, don't you, Lora? If you don't do a better job of representing your Feminist friends, you might lose your Lib Card...
What should Bush be impeached for? You're so upset about a President lying -- Iraq was a complete and utter LIE.
They why was he questioned about it under oath? Witch hunt. That's why. Republicans are threatened by a smart and powerful Democrat.
You DO take a position against RAPE, don't you, Lora?
If he raped anybody, shouldn't he have been on trial for THAT way before he ever got to the White House? There are many opportunistic people that will lie to try to get money from a lawsuit or blackmail or whatever -- and a guy like Bill with a reputation such as his is an easy target.
He should have known better. That is true. I am disappointed that his escapades with Lewinsky got out to the public. I am even more disappointed that an opportunistic GOP hired a special prosecutor and went to the extreme of leveling "impeachment" against him. That is a serious offense and should be best left to SERIOUS matters.
For crying out loud, JFK was involved with a German woman who was believed to be a spy! Nobody put him a witness stand and asked him about it.
Bush flew every single Bin Laden out the country on 9/11 to protect them from harassment here in the U.S. Why were they even here? And better yet, how did Bushie know where to find them so quickly when he couldn't find Osama for 8 more years? Bush protected Osama Bin Laden and had him well-hidden. How much did that cost the U.S. taxpayers?
They sought HIM out.
Gingrich went after Clinton out of pure jealousy.
Every unattractive Republican man wishes he was Bill Clinton or JFK.
"It depends what your definition of 'is' is." That is the most hilarious thing I've ever heard out of any President's mouth.
I use that line all the time in normal conversation. It's always a big hit.
So you play a lot of 5th grade clubs, winston?
Both the affair and the antics after it went public.
A total lack of class.
What Clinton said in response to questions about what he did with Lewinsky is part of his legacy.
Is it fair? Yes, Kennedy et al did more and often more carelessly (sharing a mistress with a mob boss), but it was a different era and attitudes changed. The press used to have the attitude that those matters were off limits. That changed in 1988 with Gary Hart's infamous liaison with Donna Rice aboard the "Monkey Business". Clinton should have known better.
His great failing as a human being has always been that he can't control his libido. This interfered with his presidency and made it less than it might have been otherwise.
But the hypocrisy of Republicans who were just as bad or worse was even less admirable.
In Canada we tend to be very unconcerned with our politician's love lives. Gay politicians have run for the leadership of their party, unimaginable yet in America. Rene Levesque, late premier of Quebec and a separatist, carried on an affair with a staff member for years and no one cared even though it was an "open secret". Pierre Trudeau was PM for years before getting married, carried on with famous women all the time quite publicly (including Barbra Streidand and Margot Kidder). After marrying and later separating from his wife Margaret, no one made political hay that his ex was running around with the Rolling Stones and getting photographed without panties on at Studio 54 in New York. We ingored it.
I think it was a newspaper in Thailand that ran an editorial asking why weren't Americans proud to have a such a virile president. I don't think I'd go that far, but I think the writer may have been on to something.
Many supporters felt betrayed when his extramarital antics became public knowledge and many others felt embarrassment for our country. Some have forgiven him, some have not, historians and Holier Than Thou bashers never will, thereby casting a cloud of public shame on his long political career.
For me, the real crime committed by Pres.Clinton, was his lying to a Congressional Committee when answering questions concerning his infidelity with Ms. lewinsky and others. However, those affairs were not public issues and therefore, I believe should have been kept a private matter between the President and his wife, out of the media and away from the general public altogether. After all, we are speaking of personal, ethical and moral issues, not a matter of state security and certainly not a matter of an accusable crime of office. Had the matter been allowed to a remain private, there would have been no need for an investigation nor any lying by the President to a Congressional Committee.
Why was the matter brought to the forefront instead of being covered up, as has always been the norm in such previously discovered presidential affairs, the answer is simple. Speaker of the House Newt Gringrich made it his personal vendetta to bring dishonor upon the administration by having the president publically embarrassed before the nation and thereby finding cause for a Congressional investigation with the goal being President Clinton's impeachment.
Speaker Gringrich held a personal distain for Pres. Clinton, harboring a deep resentful grudge after the president successfully won a standoff with the Speaker. This occurred when Speak Gringrich caused the shut down the government by refusing to allow a Congressional House vote on the funds need by the government to operate. The shut down lasted for 28 days during which the American public through their overwhelming support behind the president. This caused the Republican Party to stepin and force the Speaker to allow a vote by the House. A vote the Speaker loss and which proved to be the beginning of the end for his post as Speaker of the House.
I do not personally condone the actions of President Clinton. However, neither do I believe that the actions were suficient to warrant a Congressional investigation which in the end has served no one nor any real purpose.
It would be assertion that you are confusing personal moral and/or ethical codes, with those of legally prosecutable statutes of law, in reponding to my posted opinion.
{i.e.}
Private consentual sexual relations/acts between two mentally sane adults under existing law(s), both those of state and federal statutes, is not a criminal nor prosecutable act, even if the interlude occurred within the walls of the oval office.
However, you, as with all Gather News debaters, have a right to your opinion, even if you utilize the wrong reason for your opposition to my opinionated post.
I've obviously been talking about PERJURY, fool.
Wake the HELL UP.
In my post to this article, I left out the fact that during the Congressional investigation, it was discovered that Ms. Lewinsky actually told a close friend that she had been hired as a White House Page and while serving in that capacity, she fully intended, in her words, " To Get Her Presidential Knees" {i.e.} to engage in oral sex with the POTUS. That was the reason she kept the semen stained dress, as proof that she had accomplished her goal. There actually was no conspiracy of any kind found to be at the root of the issue, just a young woman with the idea that she had the chance to do something that millions of others could only dream about.
President Clinton, being the cad that he was, appearently overlooked the fact that Ms. Lewinsky was far to eager to please and allowed his sexual desires to over-ride his good senses.