You see, Herman Cain won't really answer the simple question: "Did you pay off these women who accused you of sexual harassment?" But he does mention his sense of humor. Is his sense of humor to blame for these recent allegations?
Does Herman Cain have a sexy sense of humor?
Ole "Squirmin' Herman" had the following to say about the allegations, and the ambiguous statement is surely enough to draw conclusions on the man's character, and the possible truth behind the accusations of sexual harassment:
"I do have a sense of humor and some people have a problem with that."
His response doesn't really hide that he's dodging the simple questions, which by itself makes him look like he's full of dung; but he really just created more questions with his weird answer. What kind of "sense-of-humor" could he be talking about, that warrants itself as a response to a question regarding sexual misconduct? It seems like he's already creating a half-assed scapegoat against these accusations because he obviously will not, or cannot, deny them.
Hey, everyone likes a good laugh now and then; dirty jokes are some of the most enjoyable. However, in a workplace environment it's absolutely unacceptable to make sexually suggestive or even minorly degrading comments whether it be done in humor or otherwise. This doesn't change whether you're a grunt who works for minimum wage or the president of some restaurant association.
If this is the case, and Herman Cain simply made some joke mistakes while in mixed company, then maybe he should just come out and say it. Hell, the right-wing fanatics won't stop loving him. These are the people who continue to listen to Rush Limbaugh even though he's been through more women than Snooki has rubbers (please, please say she uses rubbers).
It's apparent that perhaps Herman Cain isn't a viewer of the hit series South Park, because if he was, he wouldn't have missed the hilarious, and educational, Sexual Harassment Panda episode. The 37th episode took you through the dos and do nots of social situations, and the Sexual Harassment Panda even performed a cheerful and easy to understand tune. See the clip above, and here's to hoping "Squirmin'" Herman Cain sees it and just comes out with a definitive answer to the simple question he is being asked.
---~~*~~---
©Chelsea Hoffman is the Author of "Chloe and Louis," and the "Fear Chronicles," series of books. She also covers a myriad of true crime stories online. Visit ChelseaHoffman.Com to follow the blog and contact Chelsea directly.
---~~*~~---
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 100
It seems that suddenly Cain remembers having two women paid off.
He is a black hetro-sexual male. What do you expect??? It is a cultural anomaly...If he DOESN'T have a sexual harassmant scandal in his past, Jo Jo thinks he might be a fag... And, Jo Jo is suspicious of "charges" women of the 90's might have made...Phony or marginal "sexual harassment" claims were a cottage industry then...that was the most repressive decade in recent memory...
Wait...How does Jo Jo know that??? Jo Jo is now searching for other lost memories...
A fag? Are you kidding? That's the spectrum of behavior, if you don't have a sexual harassment charge against you you're gay?
You're pretty full of it jojo, but you are amusing.
Explain to me Clinton's follies and why Ibama smoked dope and lost his law license for lying about it...then we can talk about unsubstantiated and vague allegations about Cain...
Jojo needs to quit rolling around on cowpies, nose is filled with bullsh**, thinks he's eating steak.
They are still lawyers what they have done and this is old news, is forgo their licenses to assume the duties of POTUS and first lady. I thought you were a lawyer....
Not who I want for POTUS.
NO LAWYER GIVES UP HIS OR HER LICENSE VOLUNTARILY
jojo needs rabies shots.
Why did the Obamas give up their law license.
I am thinking you were sleeping during law school.
Inactive means she is not licenced to practice law...ergo, not a lawyer......neither is he for the same reason... "Lawyer" is a legal state...like "licensed beautician". You is o' you ain't...they ain't...
It has been "voluntarily inactive by court order" since 1993...this does not fit with the "liberal account that she did it to become first lady...It is my suspicion that she went inactive to avoid disciplinary action by the bar...we won't know because the records are SEALED...Big surprise...and just like his birth certificate, college records, etc...See the double standard here...Obama can stonewall and cover up when he should have met challenges in a forthright way and yet you have already judged Cain on no evidence...
Why does Jo Jo have an urge to say something like...
Res ipsa loquitur
OR
illegitimus non carborundum
OR
de minimis non curat lex
Jo Jo has no idea what those things EVEN MEAN!!!!!!!
T'was brillig and the slithy toves did gywer and gimbel in the wab.....
SEE...There it goes again...
Del I didnt know that you knew what I know that Jo jo knows but....my head hurts.
am i in a mood today or what.
what stupid movie came on after i fell asleep i wonder?
I don't know about Ford...he was in congress for so long, it might have actually made sense to go inactive...
If you'd taken Latin in high school you wouldn't have a problem with the Latin phrases that are still common in English. :)
It's "illegitimis" not "illegitimus," by the way. The phrase is a pseudo Latin gag like "semper ubi sub ubi."
Try to get some facts and then start typing.
Regardless of those things being an oxymoron in the case of these Teapublican poseurs, there is a witness.
And it really doesn't matter to me what Herman Cain and his joke campaign did 20 years ago. He's not going to be the nominee because he's a clown who is actively looking for his next paycheck.
I just think it's funny. The Teapublicans are eating their old, again.
jojo need to go back to licking balls for entertainment.
Your man Herman is the fake here. And the Teapublicans are deathly afraid that he'll be the nominee, which is why they're sabotaging his campaign already. Cain can't win and they know it. The more exposure he gets, the worse he looks.
This isn't about liberalism, this is about Herman Cain and the Teapublicans getting scared. Which is why the attacks are coming from your side. Big money wants Perry or Romney, not some guy who got his economic plan from a video game.
There's not even a question of whether he did what he's accused of, the only question is the timing of the revelation. If Democrats were behind it, they'd wait until he was the actual nominee, it would be much more compelling.
but jojo can go back to eating alpo, high intellectual activity for jojo.
In the mean time, go research why the Obamas haven't had law licenses since 2008... And...don't make me bring up the Bill Clinton show...
There's a good boy...start with "OBAMA LAW LICENSE" on google...
Fake name...
Fake SSN...
Fake history...
Fake "African American"...
Very questionable birth certificate...
lied on his bar application...
etc...
What part of Cain's history is fake???
When you have to bring that up, you lose. This isn't about the Obamas, although you'd like to make it about them because your candidate is such a clown.
This is about Cain, and the fake Teapublican acceptance of his candidacy. This isn't about some bagger conspiracy theory you people hang on to like maggots on rotting corpse.
This is about your double standards about integrety, intellectual dishonesty and inability to employ simple cognative dissonance to people and events...
PS... not a TEA or even a Republican...just don't like fake liberals...
Have you googled OBAMA LAW LICENSE yet...or do you think you can avoid FACTS by ignoring them and denegration ... very thin debating tactic...
Then you may want to explore how many names Obama has used and SSN he has had...Then you may want to look at his admitted pot smoking and how it conflicted with his bar application...
Then, tell me something...anything...fake about Cain...
This is all about him, or at least it was before you went off on your tangent.
jojo need to take head out of own a**.
Something FAKE about Cain? How about the fact that he said he had no skeletons in his closet?
When Cain is doing his new show on Fox, I'm sure he'll need a mascot. You'd be perfect for the job.
Its simple Ali, if they keep the focus off Cain they can pretend they are not big hypocrits. A president was impeached and MILLIONS of dollars spent by CONSERVATES for the same thing Cain has done.
Clinton gets impeached....Cain gets a free pass....somebody has some explaining to do.
And, Lori...you have no idea what, if anything, Cain has done...
These "allegations" (actually, allegations of allegations) are, so far, nothing...
Did he tell a dirty joke or wag his weenie in the elevator...
Did he just do a Groucho on some tight ass white broad or did he stick his hand down her blouse...
Did he make some intern have sex with his cigar or did he make a careless passing remark...
Don't you think it might be wise to wait until some details emerge???
That would be the real liberal thing to do...
Or should we just engage in character assassination by DOUBLE innuendo???
I await your decision and...some facts...Try to concentrate on the point...
And... while your at it, let's talk about Obama's character...
Here is the sum total of the facts so far...
Jo Jo does that on a daily basis...big Whoop...is this all they have???
It was the 90s...baseless and/or very thin sexual harassment charges were a big payday for ambulance chacing lawyers and tight ass bimbos in those days...
Shall we wait for the facts to support the accusation or is that too "not sound bity" for you "liberals"...
And, even if he stuck his weenie in their ear...so what??? Kennedy...Clinton...
Double standard/ intellectual dishonesty card played...
As I said before, I don't care what Cain did then. It's what he's doing now that shows that he's not fit for national office. And you can rationalize, and defend, all you want, Cain is still a clown.
I've seen blind men with seeing eye dogs, but I've never seen a blind dog with a Cain.
But, you have demonstrated the bias that makes you jump to the "guilty" verdict without any proof at all...
And, by constant omission, failed to provide any facts to substantiate your allegations...
And, you have proven yourself to be a fake liberal without intellectual honesty...
Game Over...
Jo Jo Wins...
Next opponent...
Mishy went voluntarily inactive by court order in 1993, not on the eve of her taking her 15 minutes as the first lady...therefore, if she has no active law licence, she is not a lawyer...Just a lady with a law degree who used to be a lawyer...BUT...why would she "voluntarily" go inactive for over 15 years???
Oby "voluntarily retired" his in 2008 so, for the same reason, he is not a lawyer...Again...why??? Why not, at the most, go inactive???
Here is a truism...Lawyers don't go inactive for 15 years or retire their license "voluntarily"...It is easy to maintain a license... bar dues are minimal and MCLE requirements easy...
No further public details are available so the liberal explanation of this is no more credible or backed by evidence than the conservative explanation...
Because of the plethora of sealed records and irregular and suspicious details about Obama's life (eg...where are his college and law school records) (eg Why did he wait 2 years to publish his full form birth certificate) what Jo Jo first dismissed as birther blather is starting to become a pattern of suspicion...
Especially when you throw in name and SSN changes, muslim turned Rev. Wright "black christian", George Soros connection and general failure to be forthright about all of the above, suspicion grows...
BUT...The most obvious evidence of Obama perifidy is the Jobs Bill...He, and anyone that can read, add or think (any 2 of the three is fine) knows that, if passed as-is, it would destroy the American economy...he is stumping it, at my expense, for purely cynical political reasons...
Don't talk to me about "fakes" or "integrety" until you have cleaned up all the Obama crap currently in existence...
And, when we get done with Obama, let's talk about Clinton...
Why????? Now pay attention because this is rocket science here....neither of them are currently practising law.
and all this time i thought when they said bill got oral, they meant something other than a verbalization!
Guess my wife did give me one, when she said 'go sc@%w yourself!'
For the rest you are naughty...I am sooooo telling your wife and you are going to get a spanking/
been beggin her to spank me for years - she wont do it!
i even offered to wear the little french maid thing .................
BTW...Oby's is "retired" so he doesn't have one at all...
You can't teach an old dog new tricks.
And you can't teach a birther anything.
"Does anyone really know the meaning of IS?"
"This is my body, this is my blood" They don't agree on what is means ...
Now if I wanted to clear my name and knew that I was innocent I would be jumping through hoops trying to get all communication out in the open.
It is not a "gag" order...it is a contractually agreed to confidentiality provision...SOP in these cases...She can talk all she wants to but she has to be prepared for the law suit for breach of contract...Are we going to believe a woman who, apparently, is trying to cash in twice???
Guilt or innocence, as you have already demonstrated, is of no consequence...innuendo is enough...
And, not to be too technical but...what makes you think Herman Cain has the right or power to forgive the confidentiality provision...It belongs to the Rest. Assoc.
FACTS, Lori, Facts...
When the facts come out, then we judge...
So far...no facts...
just try to prove negative. cant be done.
prove you did not sneak off, and say something dirty that only one person heard.
prove you did not call someone a name 3 months ago.
most of us afte3r time, cant even prove a positive.
prove where you were, what you said, and what you ate in any specific date 12 years ago.
and anyone can accuse.
35 years ago, i was accused of sexaul harrassment. the truth was, my wife had a birthday soon, and in addition to the jewelry etc i had, i wanted one more gift.
a girl 20 years younger than me, but pretty close to the same build had come to work.
i came in from the back, and saw her - I noticed the blouse she had on. nice cut, great pattern - i told her i liked the blouse and asked where she got it thinking i would finish up with bday presents that night.
at that point, (i had only seen the girl from the back) - she whirled around red-faced (i then knew my wife would hate it - it was very low cut).
the girl screamed at me about staring at her chest, and filed a complaint.
so ..................... how is that harrassment, just because i waqs accused?
The fact is that women made out like bandits on trumped up or exaggerated sexual harassment claims in the 90s...I know...I was there...
I was once accused (by a young broad) of being "inappropriate" because I ended a meeting with..."Well, boys and girls...let's get to it..."
I told her to go screw her self and get out of my office...
And...If you can get a sexual harassment complaint for staring at cleavage, Jo Jo is hosed...
This isn't about Cain so much as it is about the state of politics in America today...
And, I am happy to find at least one rational and intellectually honest liberal democrat grounded with proportionality, the ability to understand cognative dissonance and fundamental fairness...
Jo Jo send friend request...