Someone sent me this in email yesterday and I posted it here on Gather:
And the Main Stream Media is COVERING IT UP!
Please take the time to read the letter from Julie, and the article from Joseph Farah below, and LISTEN to the links in Julie's letter to get the FULL UNDERSTANDING. And PLEASE SPREAD this far and wide.....ACTIVATE this and make it go VIRAL PLEASE!
Sent: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 1:22 am
Subject: Re: [ronpaul-560] UPDATE: SCOTUS (Supreme Court of The United States) *******CRITICAL INFO**********
Monday, December 01, 2008
BETWEEN THE LINES
Last chance for Constitution?
Exclusive: Joseph Farah urges Americans deserve full disclosure on important matter
Posted: December 01, 2008
1:00 am Eastern
By Joseph Farah
Most Americans don't realize it yet, but this Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court will review whether Barack Obama is indeed constitutionally eligible to become the next president.
The justices will hold a conference on the question and consider the case for formal review.
The case is brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the New Jersey secretary of state, and questions whether Obama is a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.
If four of the nine justices vote to hear the case in full, oral argument may be scheduled.
It would seem a simple matter to resolve.
Barack Obama could have put this issue to rest long ago by producing a complete birth certificate from Hawaii. Instead, he has chosen to stonewall the matter, citing a website post of what can only be characterized as a partial representation of a birth certificate - one that has been criticized as a forgery.
Whether the birth certificate posted on various websites is genuine or not is almost beside the point as to his eligibility. Since Hawaii was known to register foreign births in the 1960s, the portion of the certificate released by the Obama campaign proves nothing, since it does not reveal such details as the hospital in which he was allegedly born.
Meanwhile, some of Obama's own Kenyan relatives claim to have been present at his birth in Mombasa.
This controversy, which some have dismissed as frivolous, is as serious as the literal meaning of the Constitution itself.
As I have stated before, I have little doubt a thorough investigation will prove Obama is qualified to serve the office of the presidency as a "natural-born citizen." I don't believe his campaign would ever have been successful with the specter of legal ineligibility hanging over his head.
Nevertheless, I think it is imperative to be faithful to the Constitution and to offer the American people full disclosure on such a fundamentally important matter.
Clearly, Obama doesn't think so.
(Column continues below)
But what about our U.S. Supreme Court?
Do the justices have the courage to face up to this question?
I believe they will be much more likely to do so - to take this matter seriously - if they see real demonstrations of public interest. I know of no better way for you to show that interest than to sign WND's petition.
All those signing it are receiving updates on controversy. The names will be delivered to the U.S. Supreme Court in time for its review Friday. This week will represent your last chance to impact that review.
The day this petition campaign was launched, a judge in Hawaii dismissed one challenge to produce the birth certificate stating he did not believe there was sufficient public interest demonstrated. Let's be sure the same is not the case with the Supreme Court review.
I hope you will join me in this fight for truth, justice and the American way by signing the petition. Help me spread the word. Let's turn up the heat. Send this column and the petition far and wide. Share it with your neighbors. Honor the Constitution. Save this country's most vital institutions and its honor. Seek the truth. Demand accountability.
Time is running out.
The Electoral College is due to convene Dec. 15 - in less than a month.
Barack Obama is to be sworn in as the next president Jan. 20 - less than two months from now.
Do you believe the American people have a right to know for certain their next president is constitutionally eligible for the job?
Without a chance to inspect that birth certificate for themselves, do you think we can ever be certain?
If the Constitution is not taken seriously as concerns the eligibility of the president, is it likely to be taken seriously in other matters?
If you don't take responsibility and initiative on this issue, I am convinced no one else will.
Take your stand for accountability, truth, the rule of law and the Constitution.
E-mail it to all of your friends.
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =======
Searching for Obama.
Found: 2 Showing: 1 - 2
Docket for 08-570 No. 08-570 Title: Philip J. Berg, Petitioner v. Barack Obama, et al. Docketed: October 31, 2008 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Â Â Case Nos.: (08-4340) Rule 11 ~~~Date~~~Â ~~~~~~~ProceedingsÂ and
[12/1/2008]Â Â (3k)
Docket for 08A391 No. 08A391 Title: Philip J. Berg, Applicant v. Barack Obama, et al. Docketed: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Â Â Case Nos.: (08-4340) ~~~Date~~~Â ~~~~~~~ProceedingsÂ and Â Orders~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Oct 31 2008
[12/1/2008]Â Â (2k)
Found: 2 Showing: 1 - 2
Searching for Donofrio.
Found: 1 Showing: 1
Docket for 08A407 No. 08A407 Title: Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant v. Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of New Jersey Â Â Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2 at the New Jersey Appellate Division without a docket number) ~~~Date~~~
[12/1/2008]Â Â (2k)
Found: 1 Showing: 1
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ==
http://wwwwakeupame ricans-spree. blogspot. com/2008/ 11/supreme- court-to- conference- on-obamas. html
Justice Clarence Thomas has placed a discussion of Barack Obama's citizenship on the December 5th docket for conference, meaning a discussion of the merit of this particular case.
A commenter at America's Right, who has been the leading source of excellent information on the various lawsuits, is requesting that we write directly to the Supreme Court:The Honorable Associate Justice
United States Supreme Court
One First St. N. E.
Washington DC 20543
Put docket on Envelope 08-A407
Ask him UPHOLD our Constitution with Full Disclosure as the only Constitutionally viable answer.
One commenter said he/she was sending a copy of his letter to each of the nine Justices. Good idea!
Here are some details just in from WorldNetDaily
The Supreme Court's website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the Secretary of State in New Jersey, over not only Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.
The case, unsuccessful at the state level, had been submitted to Justice David Souter, who rejected it. The case then was resubmitted to Justice Clarence Thomas. The next line on the court's docket says: "DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008."
Jeff Schreiber at America's Right has followed this case closely. His post today reports:
As for New Jersey firebrand and attorney Leo Donofrio, his application for an emergency stay was denied by Justice Souter, Donofrio was able to refile and resubmit it to the Justice of his choosing, and properly did so. Today, the docket for his action shows that after being put before Justice Clarence Thomas, the application will be discussed by the Court in a December 5, 2008 conference.
Normally, during their term, the Supreme Court Justices conference on Wednesday (typically, but not always) and review the various petitions and applications before them, deciding which of the many such proceedings should be heard by the Court. I suspect that we could soon see a similar entry on the docket for Berg's case as well.
Now, this does not mean that the Court has decided to hear either of these matters and, in fact, is fairly typical when it comes to the process. Still, for those hoping to have these cases heard on their merits, for those who feel these issues are more about the United States Constitution than Barack Obama, this is a step in the right direction.
ENDÂ Corporate Person HOOD
"Politicians and diapers should be changed often - and for the same reason."
FIRE Congress in 2010! http://www.kickthemallout.com/article.php/Video-Nelson_Walker_Tenure_Corrupts
FIRE Congress in 2010! http://www.FireCongress.Meetup.com
GET The REAL NEWS!
JOIN the Campaign for LIBERTY!
After posting it, someone sent me this link:
Someone on Multiply sent me these links:
They should have been relieved, but I have a feeling that most of them were disappointed.Â Of course, most of them were Republicans due to the fact that Ron Paul ran as a Republican to get more national attention.Â I'm not sure how the Libertarians feel.Â Since I don't affiliate myself with ANY party and remain fiercely independent, I say give Obama a chance before you go off on wild goose chases that will just cost the taxpayers even more.Â I've seen and heard some extremely mean-spirited remarks about how Obama has destroyed our country and Obama hasn't even been sworn in yet.Â I'm all for pointing out wrong doing by any politician since they are supposed to be representing the people rather than corporate interests and special interests groups, but to falsely accuse someone is wrong no matter who they are.
"Still standing for Truth, Justice, and the American Way"
Copyright Â© 2008 Cal Jennings