Although history is rife with the fall of super powers, I never thought that America’s fall would happen in my lifetime. I am saddened and ashamed of what our country has become, not only in my own eyes, but also in the eyes of the rest of the world. This country was once a palace of integrity and an example of what a country should strive for, now we are little more than a punching bag and a laughing stock.
The Bush administration has sold the ideals of our founding fathers to special interests and allowed greed and pigheadedness to take the place of morality and justice. Sadly when the rest of the world thinks of America they shake their heads and throw their hands in the air. What breaks my heart is not that the world looks only upon the Bush administration as greedy and incompetent, but that they look upon the American people this way as well - and can one blame them for thinking this way when the American people voted this administration into power twice? We, the American people, must also bare the yoke of responsibility of a world less safe, satisfying, and ethically progressive by allowing this administration to do what it has done to the world. If I sound angry it is because I am. I want my country back. I want to be greeted with open arms and smiles once again when I go overseas. Now I want to crawl into a hole when overseas. Where have our morals gone? What has happened to our sense of decency and respect?
Before Bush took office this country had a surplus for the first time in its history, we had strong allies across the world, a bull market, reasonable gas prices, the wealthy stayed wealthy and the poor and middle class saw improvement, interest rates were low, we were not at war, in short; we were progressing. Now we have the largest deficit our country has ever seen, we are in debt to developing and other advanced countries, we have few if any allies in the world, the wealthy have become more wealthy and the poor and middle class have become poorer, our education system is the worst its been in decades, interest rates are at an all time high, inflation is out of control, we are engaged in two wars with no end in sight for either, our country has been rocked by corporate scandal after corporate scandal, global warming has become a myth, corruption the norm, lying acceptable, not caring moral, denial convenient, bullying courageous, and our rights have become malleable. Bush makes Putin look progressive!
As shocking as this decline may be to most Americans, what is even more shocking is the rate at which is has taken place. How can one administration do so much damage to a country in such a short period of time – and in so doing be so impenitent and brazen about it? Corrupt administrations of the past at least went to great pains to hide their debauchery, which at least conveys that they knew themselves that what they were doing was wrong, but the Bush administration does not appear to even care if what they are doing is wrong, popular, or moral. My stomach churns every time I hear Bush tout that he does not read, nor care about public opinion polls. What kind of a leader does not care what his people think?
As a political science major it makes me sick to my stomach to reflect on how the Bush administration runs the executive branch of the most powerful country in the world. In my mind it would be more ethical for him to base his policies on a coin toss than on his reason and ideals. It’s one thing to sell our country down stream but need he laugh at us and rub our noses in it while doing it? As sobering as this reality is, one can take solace in the fact that the Bush administration doesn’t get to choose how its legacy will be looked upon by posterity, the history books and public opinion will choose for him.
In closing, America need not be the strongest country in the world if we are the most virtuous, but the Bush administrations Hobbsian “the strong do what they want, and the weak do what they must” attitude has isolated us from the rest of the world and fractured and divided us internally. We have reneged on our promises and faltered on our ideals, and in so doing we have caused violence to our reputation and the dreams of our forefathers.
No country can simply demand that it is virtuous like Bush has demanded; it can only prove that it is through its actions, and America has fallen short. Therefore, if America cannot uphold the ideals of a just system then maybe we do not deserve the honor of super power. If we do, however, want to retain our position in the hierarchy of global power then we must all wake up and stay awake, lest we all too soon forget the process of deceit and lackadaisicalness that lead to our current state, and once again vote into power an amoral administration.
Americans, we have let ourselves down and we have let the world down. We have defiled a palace. We deserve better - we are better. It’s time for a change. The Bush administration has truly ushered in the end of a great era, an end in which America did not go out on a high note or in a blaze of glory, but one in which we simply went up in flames. Shame on you George Bush, shame on us all.




Comments: 82
The disaster and destruction of hundreds of thousands of lives caused by BUSH/CHENEY/RUMSFELD is the responsibility of the American People. Our children and their children will be paying for and feeling the consequences fo these last 6 years of utterly incomprehensible stupidity.
So as an American we must all share the blame and feel the shame and vow to rid the political landscape of all those who have been a part of the George Bush/Neo-conservative disaster
Yes, we were attacked by fanatics Capt seaweed, but it is in how America responds to people like that that sets us apart and defines us as a world leader. Bush did not respond properly. He acted no better than the terrorists when he lied to the American people in order to line his and his cronies' pockets by taking us to war in Iraq on false pretenses. Has not taken reasonability for anything, just like you.
We are all to blame, but Bush and those who continue to back him are most deserving of the blame. Unless you have logic and reason to back up your rebuttal don't bother spouting your mindless, stubborn rhetoric. You Capt Seaweed need to follow your own advice and get a grip on reality. Look at where we are and what we have become throughout the world. Being arrogant, and denying it does not change reality or make it go away. Deal with it, because now we all have to weather we like it or not thanks to Bush and people like you who use instinct rather than reason when you vote.
thanks for the last post. It clarifies your irational logic and inability to come to correct conclusions about the world around you.
"he lied to the American people" Your going to have to define your understanding of the word lie and how it is used in the english language and then quote the "lie" that you think Bush made to the American people if you want me to take that koolaide statement seriously.
"people like you who use instinct rather than reason when you vote. " Clairvoyant are we???
America is, as you put it, a country of arrogance and filled with misguided people of arrogance. But it is our defense of individual rights and freedom to act and say as we please without reguard to consequence or judgement weather we agree with those that would act so or not that is the ire that fuels the fire of our enemies. At the head of the list to be stoned by those who dream of a world without America will be the sexually imoral, the socially defiant, and those who refuse to accept God. For Americans who pleasure themselfs as they wish, when they wish, because they can, [which is directly related to our relentless grasp on freedom], that concept has no understanding. Heck Bush would probably be last on the list to be stoned precicely because of who he is.
Reality is GWBush ghas done a great job in keeping our economy growing and defending our nation . Your crying about th eoil prices can be attributed more to th ebig mouth in Iran maing the world fearlul of the stability of th eoil supply as well as the lack of expanding domestic drilling or building of new refineries.
America is in no way a declining SuperPower, no rather the left is a sad bunch of losers and pessimists
What is childish is to not take responsability for what America has done the past 6 years. This is a tactic the Bush admin. has used and it is the reason the rest of the world is mad at us - denial. And by the way, my article says we are all responsable so how is that a personal attack? Do you feel guilty, is that why you took it personally?
And I am not surprised that you believe a degree in political science doesn't mean much these days when much of the Bush administration has degrees in business. However, this is the reason he has sold our country to special interests and caused America to decline. Bush and his admin. know so little about politics, nor do they read much (if they did their actions would reflect it).
Your reasoning also displays that you have not studied Politics either, but how convenient for you. Read up on the theory of cognitive dissonance, it is very relevant to people like you. And by the way, if most of the professors think the way I do then that means that the majority of the educated in this country think the way I do. What does that say about you Norman? You said it, not me.
-
-
Jim Swan's "None-Too-Great Hits" now on iTunes.
un-HOT!!! un-lewd, un-mindless. Not the usual Top-40 stuff.
Don, if you thought your son was perfect and then found out he is using heroin, would you try to get him to change his ways or simply ignore it so that you can continue believing he is perfect? No, you would tell him why drugs are bad and the consequences they will have on his future so that he will stop using them, and thus become a more perfect person. Your rants show how illogical (and unethical) you are Don.
Thanks for the support Blownapart, and thanks for the comment Jim Swan.
I don't like people who find it fashionable to criticize every aspect of our nation as if there is another nation that has anyhthing on par to offer in the ways of freedom and opportunity.
I don't like people who feel it necessary to go to court to stop other from saying the Pledge of Allegiance or Sing the Star Spangled Banner or to make a mention of Christmas during the holidays.
I think it is a sad commentary on those who subscribe to such self-loathing and nonsense, it make them unworthy of the freedom they choose to abuse twist and mangle into self serving blather.
if those charges had dropped the trade center the first time they tried Would you blame those in power then?
Somehow I doubt it.
"In the 1993 World Trade Center bombing (February 26, 1993) a car bomb was detonated by Middle Eastern terrorists in the underground parking garage below Tower One of the World Trade Center in New York City. The 1,500-lb (680Kg) urea nitrate-fuel oil device killed six and injured 1,042 people. It was intended to devastate the foundation of the North Tower, causing it to collapse onto its twin.
The attack was planned by a group of conspirators including Ramzi Yousef, Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, El Sayyid Nosair, Mahmud Abouhalima, Mohammad Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Ahmad Ajaj, and Abdul Rahman Yasin. They received financing from al-Qaeda member Khaled Shaikh Mohammed, Yousef's uncle.
The bomb exploded in the underground garage at 12:17 P.M., generating a pressure estimated over one GPa and opening a 30-meter-wide hole through four sublevels of concrete. The detonation velocity of this bomb was about 15,000 ft/s (4.5 km/s). The cyanide gas generated is assumed to have burned in the explosion.
In October 1995, the militant Islamist and blind cleric Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, was sentenced to life imprisonment for masterminding the bombing.
In 1998, Ramzi Yousef was convicted of "seditious conspiracy" to bomb the towers. In all, ten militant Islamist conspirators were convicted for their part in the bombing, each receiving prison sentences of a maximum of 240 years."
It's not about actions its about partisanship.
Or there would be inclusion of the lack of coherent reply to the COLE attack and the first bombing.
"Realize that we are at war with an enemy that will kill your mother, rape your sister, behead your brother and then start on you." Comments like this only make me wonder how some people can be so naive. The odds that the average person will ever be the victim of a terrorist attack - especially on a personel level like the one described in this statement - are miniscule. It makes little sense that extremists who idolize a stringent moral code would be running around raping anyones sister.
Oh and BTW, George Bush isn't running for office, so please keep focusing your energies on a President who is in the last days of his successful administration. It will make Rudy's job all the easier to sweep into office by a landslide.
"parliament stated that Bush asked Blaire to make up the lie about uranium" You need to provide the source and quote for that one. And you still need to define your understanding of the word lie unless of course you actually feel that Clinton and his entire administration, the United nations, and every intellegence service in the world all lied to conspire a conflict with Iraq. I don't buy that at all. And I sure don't buy that a bumbling Bush could have gotten all those people especially Clinton and his admistration to agree to such a hoax..... and you don't either really do you!
And as far as defining what a "Lie" is, I don't play childish games. We all know what a lie is and if you don't than pick up a dictionary yourself. You are pathetic.
And where do you get the idea that Clinton and his admin. lied to create a war in Iraq?! Iraq happened on Bush's watch not Clinton's! You are too much! HaHa! You just make up what you want to believe.
And as far as Bush getting congress to agree with going to war - he lied to them, it's that simple! He told them that if we don't act now we will be attacked again so we can't take the chance and the time to actually gather substantial evidence to prove an attack. What kind of scare tactic hooey is that?! He took the high emotion of a country that had been attacked and manipulated it to get what he wanted. He promised he was right, but didn't supply evidence. If anyone demanded evidence they were called un-American because America was attacked and therefore we should not ask questions, just shoot first. you really need to go back to school.
Have you been living in a hole for the last 2 years? Do you read the papers at all? Pleading ignorance about current affairs is not a valid excuse for disagreeing with the facts. I will not do your homework. Clinton and his administration officials all made difinitive statements of concurence to the situation in Iraq with specific reguards to WMDs, Sadams non compliance with UN resolutions, etc etc etc during Clintons tenure in the White House and up to and including post 9/11. I suggest you expand your reading beyound moveon.org And you still need to quote a lie BUsh made unless you are going to fall back on the new philosophy of "it depends what the meaning of 'is' is."
But I think that standard is reserved for heads of state only.
Yours isn't the only one.
I don't trust any politicians because they all take money.
In the words of Socrates: "The unexamined life isn't worth living."
Too bad you drank the green koolaid.
You probably believe that "Mission Accomplished" meant victory in Iraq.
Or, maybe you believe the fiction that "if we fight them in Iraq,
we don't have to fight them here."
Yeah, tell that to the British and Spaniards.
Here's some links, in case you don't get my point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/11_March_2004_Madrid_attacks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
You haven't said anything that even comes close to being intelligent, so don't use your ridiculous ideas and then tell Sean, who is obviously very intelligent that he believes the same thing, talking to him like a little child. That's just demeaning and he deserves much better.
I suggest you go back under water and stick with your seaweed.
I like your pen name too! As for my "patronizing" attitude. If you read the thread and are open minded and not bias you will note that I made a very estute observation that may or may not be agreed with and was subsequently belittled and insulted by Sean. I am not one who is opposed to dropping down to anothers level to communicate a point nor will I let stand a bunch of BS that the speaker of refuses to vaidate with some form of factual evidence. Sean said Bush lied us into this war but he will not state the lie because he must know Bush and Clintons remarks about the impending conflict don't meet the definition of a lie. From there he judges and concludes with arrogance things about me that he has no knowlege of. Much like you just did. You give him a pass and me an insult. The arrogance and bias of your ilk, and I refere to what I conclude as your ilk as being the liberal left, is the root of the destruction of this nation. You don't like the message so you shoot the messenger instead of debating the point. Thats a dangerous game to play in a country that has a free press.
Well thats easy!!! Even though I never said "Clinton supported the invasion of Iraq" Here is a quote for you to ponder while your chewing some felet of sole.
"I have repeatedly defended President Bush against the left on Iraq, even though I think he should have waited until the U.N. inspections were over," Time magazine.
And here are some more of Clintons POLICY intentions while he was still in office.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
I don't know how much clearer one can say it. Only a dumbed down American would not understand a simple sentence structure like Clinton uses.
Of course if you would like those statements to fall under how you use the word lie catagory I'll still need that definition. Luckily I know what a dumbed down American is.
Heres another bit of history you might have overlooked just for enlightenment sake.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said she believes that Osama bin Laden decided to launch deadly terrorist strikes on U.S. territory in direct response to President Clinton's failed missile strikes on bin Laden's Afghanistan headquarters in 1998.
"I think once we struck bin Laden in '98, the training camps, the open-source information, in other words, the people writing books, and one of them being Yosef Bodansky, points out in his book that that was a turning point for bin Laden," Sen. Feinstein told CNN's "Late Edition."
"That's when he decided he was going to go after the United States. Now, I happen to believe that's correct," she contended.
With her comments to CNN, Sen. Feinstein becomes the highest-ranking elected official to endorse the theory that the deadly 9-11 attacks were planned in direct response to the ill-fated 1998 strikes, which included an attack on a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory.
Clinton has repeatedly tried to justitfy the 1998 missile strikes, sayings he had reliable intelligence that placed bin Laden in his Khost encampment up to a few hours before the attack was launched.
Gee Sean, can you enlighten me here??? Did Clinton lie to us or was it really faulty intellegence that caused him to bomb an aspirin factory?? You being the know all see all guru of whats real and whats not.
"Denying Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction" does not mean we have to go to war, which Clinton proved. Clinton kept Saddam under check without going to war, why couldn't Bush? But it is very nice that you put your own spin on these Clinton quotes to satisfy your agenda.
"Even though I think he should have waited until the U.N. inspections were over." this is a big part of the quote that you seem to have glossed over Seaweed. This entails the trust in due process, which any democracy must allow to happen if one is to propose that democracy is a superior system.
You neocons sure can spin! You've mastered that, but reason proves how wrong and misguided you are. Nice try though Seaweed. Keep making false assumptions so that you're will be able to sleep at night.
And you want to talk about Bin Laden. Bush repeatedly ignored warnings from the CIA that a terrorist attack was imminent in the weeks following 9/11. Talk about irresponsibility, at least Clinton tried to take him out, and at least Clinton took his intelligence seriously.
Keep trying Seaweed, you are simply displaying your inability to reason and interpret. You have just taken a quote and spun it. I don't fall for that childish bull however.
As to the above comment about the USS Cole the answer is no it was not me but your memory and selective reasoning can easily explain that.
And so it come down to this. We are done discussing anything until you can become a more civil being. To wit as is witnessed above by all readers;
I suggest a better grip on reality and you call me irresponsible, mindless, stuborn and arrogant.
I ask for quotes and back up and you call me pathetic and then misquote me.
I suggest you expand your reading and you call me pathetic [again] and an uninformed child.
I say I believe your conclusions are incorrect and you logic not rational and you call me childish and ignorant. You continue your tirade with insults of immoral and ignorant [again] and a dummed down American.You continue with Blind sheep, neocon cronie and ignorant [again].
I sarcastically call you a guru of knowlege and you again call me a neocon.
One can conclude with certainty by these examples and with others who have posted here that you are indeed the arrogant one with intolerant attitudes and a bias view that borders on bigotry. I have no quarter in my life with debate with those that are as baseless as you have demonstated yourself to be but I will look to your posting to see when you may demonstate a more eager willingness to engage in a more honest exchange of ideas.
Listen to him, he actually thinks he has some sort of intellectual superiority, I can't stop laughing at this child.
I know we have been under attack for nearly 30 years and a real man. a real President has finally dropped the gauntlet and responded to an enemy that is embraced as an ally by the Democrats
All of those things you listed as reasons for your leaving are also things I asked of you, but debunked with reason. I understand why you are upset. The truth hurts sometimes. The ones I didn't respond to, like the lie question and your unwillingness to do your own homework I don't waste my time with. These idiotic demands simply show how out of touch you are. They are all signs of a person who holds reason and logic in contempt. I usually don't waste my time debating people like that but it's always fun to put one who thinks he is perfect in their place. You come back when you grow up and can think without spin. Thanks for your comments, and you're always welcome to come back.
Don H., elegant and intelligent as usual. Neocons like you make my job so easy.
ob-vi-ous adj easily understood (it 3 syllables, so I thought I would help you out)
I also can't wait for 2008! Thanks for the quote Don S.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - "President George W. Bush's approval rating has fallen to 28 percent in a Newsweek Poll released on Saturday, an all-time low for Bush in that survey.
Nearly two out of three Americans -- 62 percent -- believe Bush's recent actions in Iraq show he is "stubborn and unwilling to admit his mistakes," Newsweek reported. Just 30 percent think Bush's execution of the Iraq war demonstrates he is "willing to take political risks" to do what's right."
And he still thinks he's right! WoW!
Intersting information Don S. Remember, "W" doesn't look at the polls. I'm sure he's lying about that also, but I'm sure his handlers are aware of it....however, I doubt that they care. They have made there millions and billions on the war....so they are thumbing their nose at us. Thinking, Polls. we don't need no stinking polls!
You can tell yo are near the truth when the right wing nutcases liek Cpt. Seaweed and Dale Copacobana come out reciting what they heard on Faux News last night.
Please tell Norm that the term NeoConservative is not a label invented by others, the Neocons call themselves that -and they were so proud of themselves until the bankruptcy of their ideas (the problems of the middle east can only be resolved through successive wars of conquest, the American people must be "hardened to the "long war", traditional civil liberties may be sacrificed to "total war")...all the same neo-fascist bullshit that WW II was supposed to have ended. Now it has a home in our government.
The interesting thing that Dr. Curmudgeon does nto point out is that the plotters in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing were captured, tried and sentenced.
Bush has bungled every aspect of the aftermath of 9-11. Determined to force the country into a pointless and stupid war in Iraq, he repeatedly let Bin Laden escape in Afghanistan.
I have read the long string of quotes about who did and did not believe that Iraq had WMD, but the issues in the war debate (confused, of course, by Chicken Hawk Cheney's repeated declaration that any discussion was treasonous) were about the advisibility of invasion to remedy the problem.
How is it that all the opponents of war were absolutely correct in their rationale?
The French were entirely right, Old Europe said that the weapons were over-stated, that Iraq posed no direct threat, that invasion would unleash worse horrors that were contained by the fly-over surveillance tha the US performed successfully (with the French) for more than ten years.
It is the tangle of lies, fraud and deceit from the AWOL in Chief that led us into this greatest foreign policy blunder in the nation's history.
Big ten, and "I can't wait for 2008."
http://bushwacker.gather.com/
is through the "Perot effect", or the "Nader effect",
in which too many candidates enter the race,
effectively watering down the voting, so that
someone, who is probably not the best person
to lead this country, will somehow sneak in
by getting the majority of the electoral vote,
but not the popular vote.
The current crop of Republicans are a big snore fest.
It's like choosing between Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Dumber.
The differences are minor.
They all support the continuation of the Iraq War, of course,
and will try to convince people that if you don't support the war,
you don't support the troops either, and are somehow
un-American or Un-Patriotic. Same old lies.